Teachers' salaries should be based on the academic performance of their students.
(This essay was done within the actual test time; 30 mins)
Today, with the increasing attention on education, the role of a teacher is significantly being put into the spotlight. One thing to note: teachers are employees. With this in mind, the prompt recommends schools and governments to base their salaries on the performance of the students. One may realize that such topic is not a trivial one. However, I argue that the salary of a teacher should be valued based on the performance of their students, for two reasons.
First, by implementing the recommendation teachers are given more incentive to simply teach well. Many suggest that if an educator received a tenure-ship from where he/she is teaching, it means they have done extremely well doing so. One can argue that a tenure may lead to a buffer in terms of a teacher’s progress on excellency in teaching, since it is guaranteed that they will be employed for a presumably long time. Thus, giving an incentive for the teacher by evaluating their student’s performance linearly to their salary will push the teacher to keep demonstrating excellence.
Furthermore, teachers will find new teaching techniques. For example, if many of the students are under-performing in the class, the teacher in charge would in effect receive a low salary. Thus, to keep sustaining themselves and their family, teachers are incentivized to find new techniques in teaching that can encourage the class to sufficiently learn, and master the topic.
Despite all of this, it needs to be mentioned that such recommendation does not have a right or wrong answer. However, based on the reasons above, by implementing the suggestion teachers would put more effort into teaching and making sure that their students would do well.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 291.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11683848797 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98039792884 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556701030928 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 704.065955056 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8064230165 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.357142857 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3928347925 0.243740707755 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132745790862 0.0831039109588 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126953314867 0.0758088955206 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188392962774 0.150359130593 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12305736312 0.0667264976115 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.