Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
The author brings up a controversial issue whether the salary of teachers should be based upon the performance of the students they teach. Indisputably, the teachers play an important role in educating their group of students and to some extent also influence on the students by their particular way of teaching. Nevertheless, total salary of the teachers should not be on the basis of their student's academic skills but should only partially vary on it with a minimum base amount of salary. Also, the basis on which we measure the salary should be fixed and in consensus of every other teacher rather than merely on the grounds of competition among various groups of students.
First of all, if the performance of the students reflect teacher's salary then somehow teachers would try to improve the performance of their pupils compared to either among other such groups of students or previous year's data. Now, if they compete among internal groups they will thrive to get better results among the institution's different groups. In some cases it may be possible that the teacher for its own selfishness of having a greater share of salary would impose some restrictions on students or may replace some of the playing time of children which may fetter the overall development of children and the very own purpose of setting such a scheme will be defeated.
Furthermore, if the comparison is between the previous year's data, then in such cases teacher's have a specified target and will be able to get better results the following year if planned in a proper way. Hence the target should be set before applying such strategy to vary salary on the basis of performance otherwise the overall development of children won't be reflected. Also, the target should not be skyrocketing or possessing very high expectations.It should be achievable by both students and teachers.
On the other hand, if the whole salary of the teacher varies upon the academic performance of the students then the teacher may always be in pressure of giving his/her best which might hinder him in giving his/her best. Because working in an environment imposing pressure will not be good for the institute. Hence I suggest that there should be a fixed base salary of the teachers and partially varying salary according to the performance of the students so that the teachers are relieved of pressure as they already get a fixed base salary rather than a salary which is completely based on students performance.
In sum, I would like to conclude that the author's argument has condoned various conditions which he should have imposed while making this claim such as, fixed base salary and target identification of the teachers of what they should achieve rather than competitive grounds of measuring salary. Hence, there be a balance between fixed and varying salary to get optimum results.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 377, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ary of the teachers should not be on the basis of their students academic skills ...
^^
Line 2, column 216, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
...her such groups of students or previous years data. Now, if they compete among intern...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 518, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...restrictions on students or may replace some of the playing time of children which may fett...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
... the comparison is between the previous years data, then in such cases teachers have ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...r results the following year if planned in a proper way. Hence the target should be set before ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...lowing year if planned in a proper way. Hence the target should be set before applyin...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...ng or possessing very high expectations.It should be achievable by both students a...
^^
Line 4, column 308, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ure will not be good for the institute. Hence I suggest that there should be a fixed ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 591, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...n a salary which is completely based on students performance. In sum, I would like to c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 43, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... sum, I would like to conclude that the authors argument has condoned various condition...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, while, such as, first of all, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2385.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 477.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70020801594 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.438155136268 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 743.4 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.9728343814 60.3974514979 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.0 118.986275619 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8 23.4991977007 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 5.21951772744 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40118916658 0.243740707755 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160866147069 0.0831039109588 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103420130235 0.0758088955206 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251441206165 0.150359130593 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101803677587 0.0667264976115 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 14.1392134831 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 48.8420337079 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.