Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
The main responsbility of teachers should be to improve their students' academic performanc; by this logic, a student's academic performance should reflect the effectiveness and competence of their teachers. While this may be true, there are many other factors that can determine students' academic performance which are outside their teachers' jurisdiction, including the students' family environment, backgrounds, and more importantly the students themselves. Thus, basing teachers' salries entirely on their students' academic performance would spring up more problems that it would solve.
To begin, it would be unfair to give higher pay to teachers whose students are performing better in school, because students' academic success is determined by a wide gamut of different factors, many of which are of little to no correlation with their teachers' teaching capability. For example, research has shown that students coming from a wealthier household and having parents with college degrees or higher tend to achieve more academically than their fellow students. It would not be fair to award a teacher more salary simply because they are assigned to teach a class with more students coming from a privileged family and vice versa.
On another note, there are students who do not wish to put in their efforts in school, always slacking off and refusing to learn. In this case, these students would inevitably have poor academic performance, and it would also be unfair to penalize a teacher, reducing their salary, for their students' lack of effort in learning. Thus, teachers' salaries should not be based on their students' performance because their competence in doing their jobs plays only a partial role in the students' academic success.
Furthermore, if teachers' salaries were in fact commensurate with their students' performance, other unforseen problems that can jeopardize the student-teacher relationship may arise. If students are aware that their performance can influence their teachers' earnings, they may feel that their teachers are now in their control, thus reversing the power balance in the classroom. To illustrate this, a group of students can threaten to intentionally perform worse as to deduct the salary of a particular teacher whom they hate. On the other hand, teachers may also see this new rule as an opportunity to earn extra money at no extra work. Many teachers may mendaciously present their students' academic performance as better than what it really is to get a pay raise. This forged academic success may lead to many greater flaws in educational institution. Ultimately, basing teachers' salaries on students' success can vitiate the teacher-student relationship.
Although a teacher's teaching effectiveness certainly plays a part in their students' academic progression, it is unwise to base their salaries entirely on the students' performance. Doing so will be unfair to some teachers assigned to particular groups of students, whose academic success are largely determined by other factors. Doing so will also potentially put the classroom relationship between teachers and their students at risks. Consequently, with the ultimate goal of perpetuating a healthy learning environment for students, we should understand that teacher's competence at their jobs may not be immediately and directly reflected by their students' academic performance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ents academic performanc; by this logic, a students academic performance should r...
^^
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a student' or simply 'students'?
Suggestion: a student; students
...ts academic performanc; by this logic, a students academic performance should reflect the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 371, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ir teachers jurisdiction, including the students family environment, backgrounds, and mo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 892, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...Ultimately, basing teachers salaries on students success can vitiate the teacher-student...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... to base their salaries entirely on the students performance. Doing so will be unfair to...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 561, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...for students, we should understand that teachers competence at their jobs may not be imm...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, if, may, really, so, thus, while, as to, for example, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2861.0 2235.4752809 128% => OK
No of words: 518.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52316602317 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77070365392 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00497306985 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457528957529 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 872.1 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2419749815 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.05 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.65 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.459870249009 0.243740707755 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.195664045669 0.0831039109588 235% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104955460766 0.0758088955206 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.335573582163 0.150359130593 223% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661610489779 0.0667264976115 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.1639044944 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.