Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
Teachers are the emissaries of education, cornerstone of our society. Their role is to provide students with a holistic view of the respective fields conveyed so that they can burgeon in their personal and professional lives. Given the complexity of the task, often prejudiced by the plethora of aspects I will try to address in the subsequent passages, it would be clear that professors' skilfulness is not contingent upon their students' academic performance, negating then the view posited above.
To begin with, the frame within which teachers' salaries should be assayed, according to the statement, is obscure. It hasn't been clearly drawn whether the assessment must be done periodically, monthly or by calculating the median grade of the children having attended their classes after two, five or ten years. One can't either fail to consider that some topics are viewed more arduous than others by students. The national average in equation solving tests, for instance, is lower than the one in optional languages. Therefore, an experienced maths professor possessing a PhD might earn half a supply Spanish teacher's wage in the United States.
Votes aren't either always the best yardstick of the comprehension's degree of what had been imparted to students. Many swallow as much information as possible before exams, without seizing the core of the knowledge transmitted, often readily forgotten one week later. Since the role of pedagogues is to educate students and imbue them with an avid desire of learning, with curiosity, grades are too superficial to ascertain whether a teacher is competent and valuable. Some teachers might even be inclined to prepare students only to the national exams, which in the long-run, would mould citizens into robots.
The exposure proposed by the author also fuels the already unequal education system, insofar the professors of major cities' centre schools, or rich surroundings, would be far more awarded than their counterparts in underprivileged areas. The gap existing between certain disparate social strata, would rub off on the salary of the teaching profession, despite most of them put their nose to the grindstone, for certain children to slip out of their all planned out, brooding and less colourful, future. On the inside of schools, the classrooms are randomly assigned to professors, in which the students' level vary even before the year begin. The proposal would thus result in wages granted to professors independently of their abilities, and biased by red tape.
Harmful ramifications might even extend beyond the boundaries of inequality, rising the resort to unfair means to reach some goals, unethical to this profession's essence. If their salaries were directly proportional to the students' academic performance, certain teachers might be tempted to be less severe, lenient, or indulge in malpractice. We would be living in a society where teachers are like traders, engaged in a race to wealth. It is, though, important to highlight that in many countries, even the most developed, professors are underpaid and struggle to properly do the job they are in love with. Besides a fixed salary, evolving equally for all of them, there is no reason for not lauding brilliant minds by means of additional payments, granted through germane assessments.
To conclude, the instances I humbly threw the light on highlight that academic performance is insufficient and doesn't mirror properly the efforts put through by professors. The students' progresses, feedbacks, and extra-curriculum activities are other possible instruments of measure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 378, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...equent passages, it would be clear that professors skilfulness is not contingent upon thei...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...ording to the statement, is obscure. It hasnt been clearly drawn whether the assessme...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 317, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...asses after two, five or ten years. One cant either fail to consider that some topic...
^^^^
Line 3, column 545, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'maths'' or 'math's'?
Suggestion: maths'; math's
...al languages. Therefore, an experienced maths professor possessing a PhD might earn h...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 7, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...rs wage in the United States. Votes arent either always the best yardstick of the...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun swallow seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many swallows'.
Suggestion: Many swallows
... of what had been imparted to students. Many swallow as much information as possible before ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 151, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professions'' or 'profession's'?
Suggestion: professions'; profession's
... to reach some goals, unethical to this professions essence. If their salaries were directl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 112, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...cademic performance is insufficient and doesnt mirror properly the efforts put through...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 187, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'progress'.
Suggestion: progress
...put through by professors. The students progresses, feedbacks, and extra-curriculum activi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so, then, therefore, thus, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 90.0 58.6224719101 154% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3042.0 2235.4752809 136% => OK
No of words: 565.0 442.535393258 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38407079646 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87542086881 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91298937305 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 334.0 215.323595506 155% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591150442478 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 927.0 704.065955056 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0472012035 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.260869565 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5652173913 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.17391304348 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327850343109 0.243740707755 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771116544364 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827399684314 0.0758088955206 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151124132064 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399179834969 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.38706741573 118% => OK
difficult_words: 181.0 100.480337079 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.