Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Technological innovations are part and parcel of human life. A novel innovation which is prevalent today becomes obsolete tomorrow. Thus, in the realm of scientific innovations and developments, there are always new things which are aimed to make the human lives easier. However, I do not agree with the notion that technology complicates our lives, but rather it simplifies it.
In the first place, consider the technological advances in the field of medicine. In the earlier days, to perform a cardiological surgery the doctors have to work on for hours together in order to make the surgery successful. Yet, in the recent years due to the advancements in the technology, a complicated operation could be performed using advanced medical instruments within a short period of time. In addition to the cardiological surgeries, there are innumerable sub-fields in the medical realm which are benefitting a lot due to the advances in technology. Hence, one can come to a conclusion that technological innovations facilitate the people to lead a simpler life.
Secondly, technology also plays a vital role in the field of military. According to the statistics, during the Second World War, around 3 lakh people lost their lives and around 5 lakh of them were wounded. The demolishment of property was intense and thousands of millions was wasted on waging a war. But, in the recent times, Robots - which can substitute the humans in a war - were being used so that a number of lives can be saved as well as the damage which is being effected to the country can be ebbed. Recently, Japan has used this scheme to fight a war, using Robots, with Korea and there was a minimal loss of property and lives when compared to the lethal incident which took place during the Second World War.
In contrast, technological advances in some situations make the lives of the people more complicated rather than making them easier. In 2014, US has conducted a survey in the state of Texas regarding the number of hours a person spends on his or her mobile phone in a day. The results were found to be astonishing, around 70% of the people spend more than 18 hours in a day while chatting, gaming and using for other works. They spend less than 10 hours in a week spending with their families and this made the government befuddled. People are getting involved in the gadgets too much so that they are not caring for their loved ones and thus making their lives pressurised and complicated. Thus leaning too much on technology as negative effects on the mankind.
In summary, technological advances benefit a lot to the people who use them in a proper manner. There are innumerable instances in which technology has facilitated the humans in leading luxorious life. However, if we rely too much on the technlogy, rather than making the lives easier,consequences of technology would be counter-productive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...nced medical instruments within a short period of time. In addition to the cardiological surge...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'lakh' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'lakhs'.
Suggestion: lakhs
...kh people lost their lives and around 5 lakh of them were wounded. The demolishment ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 77, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper manner" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...enefit a lot to the people who use them in a proper manner. There are innumerable instances in whi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 285, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , consequences
...ogy, rather than making the lives easier,consequences of technology would be counter-producti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, in addition, in contrast, in summary, as well as, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2409.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 487.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94661190965 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69766713281 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95240720047 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501026694045 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 760.5 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 4.38483146067 342% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0518598664 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.739130435 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1739130435 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86956521739 5.21951772744 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137844244468 0.243740707755 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0396184422208 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411557822442 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0815649591961 0.150359130593 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042047494088 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.