Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It is human tendency to criticize any idea which might seem a bit unorthodox for the first time. But that does not mean that the particular idea is not worth looking through, regardless of what skeptics say. Let's take a look at this.
Usually, these unorthodox ideas are the ones that has changed the public perception of general items in our daily lives. Previously, laptop comprised compact disks drives in them so that they can read disk drives. This thought process was changed by Apple in their laptops by removing disk drives, as the software consumption predicted by them was going to be digital. Now, if you look at entire laptop range, you will find just one or two out of plethora of laptops with disk drives because most of the people have actually moved on from consumption of media from disk drive to internet.
Not only that, these criticized ideas, if seen through, brings about a change in general mindset of an individual. In the reneissance period, there was no concept of science. A common belief was held by most of the people that almighty is the one who controls all of the phenomenon that occur on earth. But, people like Galileo and Da Vinci were the ones who incorporated the notion that these occurings can be explained by science. This notion was then laughed at by everyone. Now, if you look at it, most of the breakthroughs made by the mankind is because of science. If not for those people, we would have been still stuck writing letters under the candlelight.
And lastly, these diffident ideas, if seen through, also bring about a change in our culture. Previosly, in our society, an idea of marriage with a person of different religion was scorned. But, due to persistency of individuals, the idea was actually seen through not only to the point of public adoption, but is now extended to an extend where two people of same gender can marry each other.
As seen above, if these ideas are usually seen through, whether it's related to general consensus of a product, mindset of an individual or even society, would bring about a change in our general lives and would leave a lasting legacy of those individuals in our minds, whether good or bad.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...rough, regardless of what skeptics say. Lets take a look at this. Usually, these ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...e that almighty is the one who controls all of the phenomenon that occur on earth. But, pe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 331, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...public adoption, but is now extended to an extend where two people of same gender can mar...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 80, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'consensus'.
Suggestion: consensus
...ly seen through, whether its related to general consensus of a product, mindset of an individual ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, lastly, look, so, still, then, even so, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1806.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 383.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71540469974 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4887232119 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54046997389 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0786289543 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.333333333 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2777777778 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16440988277 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045707948397 0.0831039109588 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316456018235 0.0758088955206 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0869024406061 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213883425441 0.0667264976115 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.