Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy.
Whenever a person is coming up with an idea for something, there is always both support and oppoissition for them. Regardless of what the others might think, If they focus on working in that idea wholeheartedly, then they succeed in implementing it for a cause. This prompt suggests that those who see their ideas through, even amongst the expression of doubts and criticizm, are the ones with the lasting legacy. In my opionion, I completely agree with this statement for the following reasons.
First of all, If a person was to be demotivated by the slight hints of doubts or criticizm shown against his/her ideas, then he/she might miss a important chance of showing their skill. For example, The famous singer Yogi B from India was always criticized for his way of song creation. He was the first to reconcile the hip-hop music beat and the classical Tamil music. Many people had doubts wheather he will be successful in making two vast music geners compatible. He recently stated in a interview, that he never cared for the doubts and criticizm others had shown for his ideolgy, He wholeheartedly believed that, this form of music will be a great hit among the people. From the above scenario we can state that if we show interest in our ideas and implement it with unshakable determination and passion, then we will be able to succeed eventhough many people might have doubts agains it.
Eventhough, determination and passion will help us succeed among criticizms and doubts, One more thing that makes a person leave lasting legacy is self-confidence.
Without self-confidence a person might easily be broken from the doubts shown towards him. For example, The Great magician Houdini, known for his deceiving skills and escaping talent, made a great mistake in life by denying to perform a dangerous magic act. The act was to stay locked up in a safe under the water for a month and then emrge unscathed. Though, the plan was made perfectly to decieve everyone, Houdini was not confident enough to pull it off as his wife was doubtful with him performing such a dangerous act. Thus, he started to lose confidence and backed of from it. The successor magician pulled this act and was lauded by everyone. Thus, if he had had more self-confidence he could have pulled off, and left a even greater lasting legacy.
Ofcourse, one might argue that if a person didnt take the doubts and criticizms shown towards his idea, he might doom himself and others relying on him, But as discussed, if he is determined and self-confident then he can implement his idea perfectly and leave a lasting legacy. Thus, those who wholeheartedly put themselves to their ideas, eventhough other show doubts and criticizm are the ones to leave a lasting legacy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...t his/her ideas, then he/she might miss a important chance of showing their skill...
^
Line 3, column 492, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...eners compatible. He recently stated in a interview, that he never cared for the ...
^
Line 6, column 216, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'denying performing'.
Suggestion: denying performing
...talent, made a great mistake in life by denying to perform a dangerous magic act. The act was to s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 726, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ence he could have pulled off, and left a even greater lasting legacy. Ofcours...
^
Line 8, column 44, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ourse, one might argue that if a person didnt take the doubts and criticizms shown to...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, then, thus, as to, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 57.0 33.0505617978 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2285.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 468.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88247863248 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75193352092 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504273504274 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 691.2 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9269836483 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.25 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206602911437 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685173488414 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108974748912 0.0758088955206 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142426163019 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0971461663153 0.0667264976115 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.