A true university education encompasses far more than the narrow, specialized study of a single discipline. Only through exploring the broad spectrum of liberal arts courses can students become truly learned.
The main duty of universities is to flourish appropriate students for the society, a huge responisibility having paramount role in the development of a country. It is obvious that there are several dimensions in science and liberal art that prepares students to enter the industry, however, the university can support only by limited sources. Accordingly, I agree with this statement to some extent.
As a threshold matter, students have to be acquainted with some important knowledge without which they cannot act effectively in society. For example, besides mathematics and physics, they need to be tutored in moral ethics, human rights and so forth. Since our life is a complex combination of science and liberal arts, people need to acquire correct information on both sides in a balanced manner. Imagining engineers without any literature knowledge or artists without even basic mathematic skills seems deeply weird.
Moreover, that the universities are not to produce raw science but a practical version of science should be highly paid attention. Human being learns science to ease the life, to utilize it for an enjoyable living. Admittedly, pure scientific fields are not capable of providing a comprehensive frame work to implement practicable affairs. In other words, miscellaneous fields have to entwine form a practical platform. To illustrate it, I want to explain the automobile industry. In spite of the fact that the area is connected directly to mechanical, electric and other fields of engineering, it is the art of management area to sell products and acquire money. The raw engineering source is not able to earn money at all.
On the other hand, it is utterly illogical to expect the university render the whole area which may be once useful since the domain is infinite and requires quite a few amount of time and investment. Universities, in the most efficient situation, can present a comprehensive introduction to the needed fields and draw a paradigm about various spectrums of skills and knowledge students should learn. What seems significantly pivotal is encouraging students to follow complementary coursers and explaining the value of liberal arts besides their specialized discipline.
In succinct, the idea that students should be provided with liberal arts beyond their single discipline is to some extent true from my opinion; because the practical life requires entwined knowledge in broad variety of fields. Nonetheless, the confined capacity of universities impedes a comprehensive study on all of the required materials.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 167, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun amount seems to be countable; consider using: 'few amounts'.
Suggestion: few amounts
...domain is infinite and requires quite a few amount of time and investment. Universities, i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "requires entwined" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'entwining' or 'to be entwined'.
Suggestion: entwining; to be entwined
...on; because the practical life requires entwined knowledge in broad variety of fields. N...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 312, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...sities impedes a comprehensive study on all of the required materials.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, besides, but, however, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, for example, in other words, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2165.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 402.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3855721393 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05858997729 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584577114428 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 692.1 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8675253357 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.947368421 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1578947368 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.89473684211 5.21951772744 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165159839582 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.042798338458 0.0831039109588 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524663815891 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0992848391941 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601992145842 0.0667264976115 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.