To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev

Essay topics:

To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Some people believe that we must know major cities of a society in order to scrutinize the most important characteristics of it. However, I strongly believe that it is not true, I think acknowledged with a single person and minor cities are more helpful in understanding a society.

A person is more significant factor that represents the features of the society. A preeminent scientist of the America, Thomas Edison could be a proper example of it. Thomas Edison lived in America when the first lightbulb was advented, it was stunning to whole society. Edison shows the time when people were started to use electronic and their lives before and after the lightbulb he invented. The first lightbulb exist for very short time and it was exorbitant that many scientist include Edison were attempted to develope the durable and affordable one. But, it was very demanding for scientist to invent a new lightbulb that many of them abnegated to invent it. However, not like others Edision tried over millions of trial and finally made long-lasting and inexpensive lightbulb by devising filament.

There are more people who represent the society well. Kim Dae Jung, the past president of the South Korea is one of them. He was a great exampler that shows the peacful period of East Asia and Korea. North and South Korea was in distant relationship because since the end of the war between them. Dae Jung struggled to solve their problem through endorse North Korea with many foods and clothes. Also, he tried to build more peaceful democratic country and advocate democracy near South Korea. Due to his relenteless effort, he won the Nobel Peace Prize, finally.

Major cities could not help to understand their own society until the globalization has prosperated. For instance, Hongkong, was civilized by Great Britian and currently is territory of China, is one of the most densely populated city in the world. As globalization gradually increased, Hongkong began to lose its color of both British and Chinese. It has absorbed various cultures from all around the world that it is no more possible for people to find the only characteristic of the society in Hongkong. Thus, I strongly believe that it would be better to study minor cities which is not influenced by the other cultures, in order to fathom the society better.

In summary, not like other people, I disagree with the assertion that studying major cities help understand the most significant characteristics of a society for the reasons I mentioned above. It would be better to understand a society’s features by prominent people and unhampered minor cities.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: KNOW_NOW[5]
Message: Did you mean 'now'?
Suggestion: now
Some people believe that we must know major cities of a society in order to s...
^^^^
Line 3, column 471, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun scientist seems to be countable; consider using: 'many scientists'.
Suggestion: many scientists
...y short time and it was exorbitant that many scientist include Edison were attempted to develo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, so, thus, well, for instance, i think, in summary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2199.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 435.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05517241379 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77917248643 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512643678161 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 695.7 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.981550633 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.6086956522 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9130434783 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86956521739 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142975312591 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0396854720594 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046699517482 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.095821872228 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594218120705 0.0667264976115 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.