To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The statement is trying to focus in the fact that the major cities might represent the most important charactristics of an entire society. On these cities there is the biggest populational concentration, and for the aspect of a population that represents the society, the major cities could shows all the problems with an easier way.
When an company needs to make a referendum, they will try to interview many people as possible. So the biggest cities are the perfect place to achieve the highest population. Furthermore, studying a population concentrated in the same area is easier than make the same study in different places getting data from less sources. Another key point is that the population of a major city also represents the people from the countryside or another states, there is always a person that leaves your small city to find a new job on the bigger cities, as well someone that go to the major cities to make a graduation course.
Moreover, the characteristics that the statement tells are amplified in a place with a bigger population. The social problems, like poverty, drugs and violence are more evident in major cities when compared with the smaller ones and that afirmation is valid for all aspects. It’s easier to see that watching the daily news, which the most relevant cases come from the most important cities (the major cities).
In conclusion, the major cities hold the most dense area of population that could be originated form all over the country, in other words, this place is able to represent in a very good way the behaivior of a society and its most important characteristics.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-27 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
2020-01-26 | snowsss | 50 | view |
2020-01-26 | snowsss | 50 | view |
2020-01-22 | nikhil40507 | 33 | view |
2020-01-16 | satyam63 | 50 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reasons and examples to support your an 73
- Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Many consumers ignore commercial advertisements. In response, advertising companies have started using a new tactic, called “buzzing.” The advertisers hire people—buzzers—who personally promote (buzz) products to people they know or meet. The key 73
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'show'
Suggestion: show
...nts the society, the major cities could shows all the problems with an easier way. W...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 6, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... the problems with an easier way. When an company needs to make a referendum, the...
^^
Line 2, column 313, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun sources is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...y in different places getting data from less sources. Another key point is that the ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 2235.4752809 61% => OK
No of words: 275.0 442.535393258 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92363636364 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80385566882 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 215.323595506 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523636363636 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 704.065955056 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.909860576 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.4 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.21951772744 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156895621784 0.243740707755 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684577721093 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465749876866 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107353710749 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510106189493 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 100.480337079 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.