To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
This topic raises the debatable issue of whether major cities reflect the salient characteristics of the complete society. Indisputably, foremost impressions regarding the characteristics of the society are made by observing the major cities. Nevertheless, I believe that the major cities of any region cannot provide an authentic picture of its society's characteristics due to the sheer diversity present throughout the region. Thus, I generally disagree with the opinion that the major cities of a region portray the most important characteristics of the society present.
First of all, even amongst metropolitan cities across a region, the society is not constant with time. Society keeps evolving as long as the individual resident's progress in any direction. The evolution of the characteristics of the society in metropolitan cities is agile and prone to changes. In contrast, smaller cities and towns tend to be more inertial in adopting new characteristics and thus provide a more accurate assessment of society. To illustrate, let us look at the example of Fast Developing East Asian countries like China, India, Japan where the metropolitan cities are quite dynamic and provide a completely different picture when compared with more rustic regions of each country.
Secondly, due to multiple factors like population, poverty, employment, pollution, and quality of life, the important characteristics of respective societies present in each metropolitan city may vary. The major cities of any region are likely to be well connected with the rest of the world and is expected to have a steady inflow of migrants from different regions. This results in the mingling of different ideologies and ultimately societies. Due to the constant exchange of ideas and cultures, the outlook of societies in the major cities may be inconsistent with their smaller counterparts. The smaller cities tend to fairly retain the majority of the original characteristics that were considered important by the society.
Admittedly, the major cities act as an introductory portal for the rest of the world. The impressions formed while interacting with the society of major cities is suffice to quench the inquisitiveness of most. However, the above argument does not constitute a sufficient support to claim that the study of major cities is sufficient to form an impression about the prevalent society of the region.
In conclusion, although metropolitan cities provide a mild, modulated version of the society of the region, I believe that the complete study of the important characteristics of a society can only be done successfully if the minor cities and towns are also studied. This approach provides a holistic approach to understanding the society exhaustively. As long as both metropolitan cities and smaller, uninfluenced cities and towns are studied in tandem, comprehensive insights can be gained regarding the society. In fact, most studies being done currently are more interested in the hinterlands and remote cities of most regions to imbibe the authentic characteristics of the society present.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 164, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'sufficed'.
Suggestion: sufficed
...ing with the society of major cities is suffice to quench the inquisitiveness of most. ...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'regarding', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast', 'in fact', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.25855513308 0.240241500013 108% => OK
Verbs: 0.121673003802 0.157235817809 77% => OK
Adjectives: 0.125475285171 0.0880659088768 142% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0551330798479 0.0497285424764 111% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0114068441065 0.0444667217837 26% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.136882129278 0.12292977631 111% => OK
Participles: 0.0380228136882 0.0406280797675 94% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.21869538789 2.79330140395 115% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0266159695817 0.030933414821 86% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.140684410646 0.0997080785238 141% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00950570342205 0.0249443105267 38% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00570342205323 0.0148568991511 38% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3110.0 2732.02544248 114% => OK
No of words: 480.0 452.878318584 106% => OK
Chars per words: 6.47916666667 6.0361032391 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.58838876751 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.433333333333 0.366273622748 118% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.352083333333 0.280924506359 125% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.25 0.200843997647 124% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.166666666667 0.132149295362 126% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21869538789 2.79330140395 115% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 219.290929204 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.4625 0.48968727796 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 52.4560060753 55.4138127331 95% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6194690265 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.8571428571 23.380412469 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2255693664 59.4972553346 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.095238095 141.124799967 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 23.380412469 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.904761904762 0.674092028746 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 58.0654761905 51.4728631049 113% => OK
Elegance: 2.30303030303 1.64882698954 140% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.487599051564 0.391690518653 124% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.143578408336 0.123202303941 117% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0661278289353 0.077325440228 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.662976747127 0.547984918172 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.149153740041 0.149214159877 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.261583315831 0.161403998019 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865557438863 0.0892212321368 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.549466437228 0.385218514788 143% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0487486008587 0.0692045440612 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.393215658564 0.275328986314 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259987265852 0.0653680567796 40% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88274336283 143% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 2.70907079646 258% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 13.5995575221 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.