To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Society and its characteristics can be influenced by various factors such as its population, flora and fauna, ethics, food, tradition and so much more. Major cities in any society contribute vastly to the above-mentioned characteristics. Therefore, in order to understand any societal structure, the obvious solution might seem to be to study these urban areas. However, there are various reasons along with necessary explanations that prove otherwise.
If you consider any major city that “represents” a society, for example, Mumbai; one would see that the majority of the population consists of immigrants from other cities and towns from the same country or otherwise. Thus, over a period of time (varies from place to place) the contemporary behavior and character of the society gets “polluted” by that of other societies resulting in a scenario that doesn’t quite resemble any society in particular. Moreover, many of these immigrants tend to visit their homes during major events that influence a society such as festivals and celebrations to spend time with their families. Therefore, studying small towns and villages might prove to be more fruitful in acquiring accurate information about the characteristics of a society.
Most of the population constituting these towns happen to be early residents who have been living there for decades or even generations. These families maintain the integrity and originality of the major characteristics of their society. Every factor such as food, clothing, festivals, traditions, ethics and cultural beliefs are meticulously followed by them. In towns like these, where there is a small but accurate representation of the society one can observe behavior that are more tuned towards accurate data both in internal characteristics (such as superstitions, beliefs, etc.) as well as external characteristics (such as the agricultural practices).
In conclusion, small towns prove to be a better representation of society. Therefore, to understand the most important characteristics of a society it is more advantageous to study these towns rather than the major cities that constitute the area.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ry explanations that prove otherwise. If you consider any major city t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...same country or otherwise. Thus, over a period of time varies from place to place the contempo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ut the characteristics of a society. Most of the population constitut...
^^^^
Line 9, column 666, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ics such as the agricultural practices. In conclusion, small towns prove...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1857.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 328.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66158536585 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47359804853 2.79657885939 124% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533536585366 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7113638409 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.8 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8666666667 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 5.21951772744 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146060858839 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518917977102 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382108834081 0.0758088955206 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0961182177044 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0176655394449 0.0667264976115 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 48.8420337079 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.1639044944 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.