To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
To fathom people, society and their culture, it is crucial to deeply understand how they function as a whole. According to the prompt, major cities must be studied, to understand nature of the society. I mostly disagree with the prompt due to these three reasons.
Firstly, major cities has people staying from different places which disrupts the conclusion drawn about the society. The cosmopolitan nature of the major cities makes it difficult to extract the original nature of the society. For instance, New York which , a major city of USA, has people from all around the world. Studying about the people staying in the New York cannot give overall outlook about the characteristics of the society in the USA. Moreover, the originality of the society is changed due to amalgam of people trying to fit into the major cities. Therefore, major cities doesn't alone help to understand characteristics of the society.
Also, original nature of the society is mostly reserved in the bucolic places where people preserve and still practice their culture. Each place has it’s own uniqueness and culture making them standout from each other. For example, Texas has cowboy culture in the countryside where as Dallas, a major city of Texas, has few people who practice their indigenous culture. The original culture is of cowboy and horse riding is practiced only in the countryside. Thus, to have a clear understanding about the culture of the society it is essential to study the places where native culture is preserved.
However, major cities have people from all around the places coming together to form a heterocultural society. The changes and new form of culture can be understood when we study the change in the culture. For example, youth who follow the culture into the future stay at the cosmopolitan places for opportunities. We can study many people and their practice at once if we study the major city which has cosmopolitan society. Thus, we can know a lot of culture at once if we study a major city.
All in all, if we study a whole place the understanding of the culture can be too tedious and studying a major city to draw out the general culture of the whole place can remove originality of the culture.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 256, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...he society. For instance, New York which , a major city of USA, has people from al...
^^
Line 2, column 587, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...e major cities. Therefore, major cities doesnt alone help to understand characteristic...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: IT_IS[13]
Message: Did you mean 'its' (possessive pronoun) instead of 'it's' (=it is)?
Suggestion: its
... practice their culture. Each place has it’s own uniqueness and culture making them ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...s has cowboy culture in the countryside where as Dallas, a major city of Texas, has few ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1849.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 377.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90450928382 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66573349129 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.413793103448 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.0 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0407393598 60.3974514979 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.45 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.85 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168995829861 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650366461557 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378729976955 0.0758088955206 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107666508549 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380918462745 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.