Every human has a past. As we progress in our life, we learn from our past experiences to handle the new circumstances in present. World history is one of the example of this scenario.Sometimes, past study is essential to make a mark in prsent. Thus, I strongly disagree with this prompt.
We all study history as it gives us exposure and intimate us of the difficulties faced by our ancestors in handling the various situations in the past. We come to know that what mistakes by them led to the demolition of their entire kingdom. Learning from past mistakes helps us not to repeat them in future. Therefore, it becomes essential to study the past rather than to overlook the same. To illustrate, When new born baby learns to crawl, he gets repeated failures. But slowly after learning from mistakes, he rises again and tries to move on his/her foot.
The same is true in science and technology. When a researcher tries to pick a particular topic for research, he has to go through the previous published research article to find the shortcomings included in the current area of research. It gives him/her to know if there is any scope left to innovate something new in that arena. Research analysis of the survey article of the same topic acquaintes him/her with challenges present in the work and current progress made. Therfore, in this situation understanding the past is of use to those in current positions of leadership.
The same is true in political arena. The new leaders mimic the path shown to them by earlier leaders in the same stream. It guides them to face the new challenges of politics. Reading biography of the previous leaders helps the newphytes in guiding of the hurdles faced by them and how they overcome the same.
Similarly any new theory in science is alwaysinvented or devised on basis of the existing theories. We should be aware of the existing theories to invent a new one. Literature analysis helps us in the same. As it depends onthe natue field of study/work that future study/work depends upon the past analysis or not. It would be wrong to utter that understanding past is futile in current arena or field. I strongly reject the author's view. Therefore, I strongly reject this satatement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...progress in our life, we learn from our past experiences to handle the new circumstances in pres...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Sometimes
... is one of the example of this scenario.Sometimes, past study is essential to make a mark...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...st mistakes helps us not to repeat them in future. Therefore, it becomes essential to stu...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...han to overlook the same. To illustrate, When new born baby learns to crawl, he g...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...them and how they overcome the same. Similarly any new theory in science is alwaysinve...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... depends onthe natue field of study/work that future study/work depends upon the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, similarly, so, therefore, thus, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1853.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 385.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81298701299 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79232980706 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501298701299 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7552422951 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.2692307692 118.986275619 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.8076923077 23.4991977007 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.21951772744 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0870960737395 0.243740707755 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0268504376496 0.0831039109588 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550199939687 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0481108262745 0.150359130593 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03862093435 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 14.1392134831 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 48.8420337079 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.