“It takes many good deeds to build a good reputation, and only one bad one to lose it.” - Benjamin Franklin. With the usage of internet at an all-time high, a person’s denigrate image spreads like a wildfire while a good image takes a lot to nurture. Although, the image is very important but there is some truth behind the argument mentioned. People wear masks and lie to each other just to show how virtuous they are. In my opinion, I strongly agree that it is extremely vital to have a veneer image in today’s times for two reasons along with a reason as to why one should avoid doing this.
To begin, everything about a person in today’s savvy world is a few button clicks away, anything, someone posts will stay perpetually on the cloud – internet – not even if someone is thinking that I can easily delete what I’ve put up. For example, a lot of teenagers now earn money via ad revenue generated by the followers who visit their website, profile, channel, etc. This makes it imperative for the person to maintain a flawless image to generate money, even a small fiasco promotes a smear campaign in which there is no future left for the teenager. There are certainly cases where some devious people actually use a bad image to gain popularity and reach the same image but not everyone has the mettle to do that. This example illustrates the importance of maintaining an appealing image.
Moreover, in today’s world everything is usually taken at face value until and unless someone points that this is wrong. For instance, in India, a famous company called Maggi – makes noodles, used carcinogenic substances while making their products. Until, another company actually researched on this malign actions of this huge conglomerate they were generating a revenue in billions. This food item was cheap and easily available and hence the go to food for any hungry Indian. But, after this debacle, people actually started boycotting the company. This illustration shows us that an image alone manages to make the second most populated country in the world willingly consume junk! It was only after someone found something suspicious which actually damaged the image, that the company was forced to sell such deleterious food.
However, it is not always important to maintain this false image, especially with your closed ones. They are someone who you trust. For example, if you keep a high and mighty image, they might think you are doing fine. But, only if you show them what you are actually facing they will try to help you. They’re not omniscient, you need to tell them, the world is not full of happiness but there are instances where anyone can falter and this your closed ones are the place where you can draw strength from. It is sometimes appropriate to show your weak image but only in certain situations.
To sum up, this is a complex topic and it can also be to everyone’s preferences – someone might just choose to ignore what his/her image is in front of others. But, for others this could also be source of livelihood like online influencers who use this to attract new followers and make money. It is not limited to them but also companies who people expect to have a good image to buy from. Sadly, it is the cruel truth of today that a good image is an essential tool for anyone who wants to succeed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Until” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...substances while making their products. Until, another company actually researched on...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, while, as for, as to, for example, for instance, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 33.0505617978 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2799.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 584.0 442.535393258 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79280821918 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.91590194646 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54851444039 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 314.0 215.323595506 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537671232877 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 900.9 704.065955056 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 6.24550561798 256% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9761149401 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.653846154 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157605786341 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513308382423 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508519474617 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0909082456559 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584202936401 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 100.480337079 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.