Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Every field of study has a curriculum that prepared students for their career or job life; the more they learn about their field, the more they will gain skills and expertise. However, some argued that students should also study other courses outside their subject. Although students may get the basic knowledge about other areas, in my opinion, it is rather unnecessary or sometimes can create problems for the students, and in this essay, I am going to present my position of disagreement with three reasons.
To begin with, a variety of courses besides the main subject can kill students’ valuable time. Students only get four to five years to finish up their university education and if there are many optional courses, then their time will be wasted by focusing on those subjects instead of their field-related courses. For instance, a student who is not good at history or learning by heart subjects will suffer to read them and also to pass the course, they will try to give more effort on these optional courses. As a result, they will have less time or lose their focus on main courses. But the main target should be to make students the best in their own discipline as it only helps them to get jobs.
Secondly, every job sector has specialists who can do their job perfectly. So, having any basic knowledge would not provide any opportunity for the students. For instance, there is rarely any benefit for an engineer to learn business or arts. So, making them study these will impede their main focus. Also, no employer of the engineer will ask an employee to do arts or go to a business deal. Every field has its expert employee, so thinking someone will ask workers outside their field is rather idiocy.
Finally, optional subjects can create distractions for the students: they may get fascinated by one of the subjects and drop their main interest. For example, a literature student who has taken one of the computer courses and felt that he or she is more interested in computers than literature can make them confused about their career. But there is also no guarantee that other programs will not attract them-- he or she can find music class also appealing and concentrate on it. So, it will only make disruption and succumb to confusion about what they want because of these courses.
In conclusion, the optional subjects will not bring any benefits for the students, rather these are a burden for them as lots of time and energy will get wasted due to studying them. So, imposing many optional courses on the students is not a good judgment for the university thinking about the weight of advantages versus disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 290, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
...king them study these will impede their main focus. Also, no employer of the engineer will...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 587, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat they want because of these courses. In conclusion, the optional subjects wil...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, of course, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2205.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 456.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83552631579 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49701942206 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484649122807 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 676.8 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7915476189 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.25 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.45 5.21951772744 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139688877405 0.243740707755 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543234455238 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450135443673 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096548043405 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425252106116 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.