We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
People learn what they see around them: from family, from society, from friends. But every person is different from each other, so there is always a division in people’s views; some may follow a path or a belief, while others may deny these. However, we can learn from both of those contradictory opinions which can help us to mold our own thinking. In the prompt, it is asserted that individuals can learn more from the individuals they share the same views rather than the different ones. But, in my opinion, both are required for a person to gain wisdom and established his own principles more firmly.
To begin with, the same views can offer less--- people already knows what is to believe and it will prevent studying more or maybe sometimes enslave them to those. For example, a long before when Socratic lived, Athens citizen used to follow the same ideas and stick to those philosophies so hard that they could not see what can be the truth. When Socratic showed the Athens citizen his philosophy which can bring prosperity, they could not accept it because it would hurt their faith and question their legitimacy. So, they ostracized him and suffered him to death. But today people follow his philosophy as most of it is appropriate. From this example, individuals can see that only sticking to similar opinions can impede learning or accepting what is valid.
Secondly, the contradictory viewpoint can offer more information, not to change your position but to strengthen your beliefs. When someone disagrees with our perception, it will courage us to seek more answers whether who is correct. For example, humans in ancient before used to know that the world is flat. But then some scientists impugn it and one way to another, they started to find out the truth and it led them to know that earth is in fact an ellipsoid. So, contradictory thinking can help to gain more discoveries. Another instance is, when the Covid pandemic was running, some public in Bangladesh started to spread the rumor that some Sajina leaves can remedy the virus, and it was surprising that some educated persons also started to eat them as their knowledge was feeble. However, later on, people searched for scientific answers to break the misconceptions about it. So, sometimes if the question is not arise, then it can weaken individuals' true knowledge.
In conclusion, the same view can reinforce the learning but it can sometimes also limit not to questioning those thinking, but the differing opinion can urge them to seek more answers that expand their understanding. So, different views can offer more learning just the same as the similar viewpoints are.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 45, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...onclusion, the same view can offer less as it limits people not to questioning tho...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 359.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8077994429 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38718175406 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506963788301 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7783331661 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8421052632 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8947368421 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52631578947 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296886737173 0.243740707755 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100139104895 0.0831039109588 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739675642066 0.0758088955206 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197478715924 0.150359130593 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667960023016 0.0667264976115 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 48.8420337079 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 12.1743820225 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 100.480337079 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.