Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
“Jack of all master of none” we all have heard this saying. In this competitive world it is necessary take knowledge of all fields. So it should be started from early stage of life. I agree with this recommendation, universities should need every student to take variety of courses which are not much related to their field.
Studying different courses can help the student in many ways. Very few students are sure with their liking and disliking from young age. As we all know our hobbies, liking, disliking all changes as we grow elder. For example, when we are young we like to play much irrespective of what the weather is or what time it is but as we become young, we don’t like much to go out in summer or in noon time. So studying different courses outside the student’s field allow him/her to know his/her true interest and in which field he/she can do well.
Some of the students select their field by the influence of their surrounding or parents. And in some case parents forces too. In both the cases if student get opportunity to study different courses, he/she can either came to know his/her area of interest or he/she can decrease the level of boredom related to studies and can do overall well.
As we all know now a days competition are increasing day by day. In this, it becomes essential to have little knowledge of all fields. For example, we all know technology is advancing day by day and much mechanical equipment are integrated with some type of software, so it becomes essential to know of how to use that software to some extent to operate the machine. It helps one in many ways like no one can easily fool you; one can give his/her response in discussion of any field. Directly or indirectly it helps not to fear doing off course things in life.
However, there is some disadvantage of doing this. Not all are good at everything. Sometimes it happens that some off course courses consume more energy of students and as a result of it they unable to do well in any of the courses, even they are capable of doing well in their regular courses.
After seeing all facts and consequences I believe that this practice should be followed by all universities. After all it’s in good will for students only and through this recommendation many students can get their right way to move forward in his/her career life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
... in which field he/she can do well. Some of the students select their field by the infl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 16, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
... can do overall well. As we all know now a days competition are increasing day by day. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 22, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
...o overall well. As we all know now a days competition are increasing day by day. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, well, after all, for example, of course, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 57.0 33.0505617978 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1960.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 418.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68899521531 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60232104383 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49043062201 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 60.1693889939 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0909090909 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183409078763 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564530529852 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08033402058 0.0758088955206 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0975639224843 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490329211942 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.