Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.
With the development of modern society, residents’ lives have been greatly improved. That is to say, we can afford what we do not have the ability to buy and we have no longer worried about our physical lives. Because of the reason I mention before, people are paying increasingly more attention to the all-round development of students and the qualities of students academic. Accordingly, question is aroused whether university should require students to take coursed out of their field of study. From my perspective, university should give students more freedom to decide which courses to choose.
First and foremost, every one only has 24 hours a day which means that there will be some of the students that will find they will find few time for their own major or just for recreation. For example, some students love their major and they want to pursuit further education in this major. In order to realize this dream, they will spend a lot of time in their own major to enhance their GPA or do some experiments to ascend their research background. If the university force these students to attend some extracurricular courses, these students’ extra time will be occupied by things that will do no good their future academic life. To the worst, this kind of policy may ruin some of the students future lives.
In addition, most of the students choose their majors because of their interests and strengths. That is to say, maybe students are not interested in or good at the courses out of theirs fields of study. For instance, Sheng He, who is one of the greatest writers in China, was not good at and interested in math at all. His math score was even almost 0 in the college entrance examination while his language got the maximum score. The reason why he got that math score was that he has completely no interest in math at all so he never learned math. If the universities implement that policy and some of the students are forced to learn the courses they are not interested in, there is possibility that they will skip classes and finally have a very bad score. It is both a waste of universities’ resources and a dilemma for the students’ future lives.
In a nutshell, universities should offer students to choose want to learn instead of requiring them to study the courses out of their fields’ of study.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 86, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...rs a day which means that there will be some of the students that will find they will find ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 137, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'few times'.
Suggestion: few times
... students that will find they will find few time for their own major or just for recreat...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 683, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...the worst, this kind of policy may ruin some of the students future lives. In addition, mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 594, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... universities implement that policy and some of the students are forced to learn the course...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 61, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to want'
Suggestion: to want
...rsities should offer students to choose want to learn instead of requiring them to s...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, finally, first, if, may, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, kind of, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1943.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 405.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7975308642 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75143060432 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496296296296 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7256175857 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.944444444 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298363627704 0.243740707755 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117269538613 0.0831039109588 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126081258404 0.0758088955206 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226216168749 0.150359130593 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0965478611151 0.0667264976115 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.