Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying.
I agree with the policy that students should opt for courses within a field that they are interested in pursuing.
Humans tend to forget certain things if they are not reviewed often. When students are burdened with superfluous courses, they are more likely to forget the courses that are significant to their development in a field as they have to fill their minds with other courses as well. Students will have to devote some focus for the courses that are impertinent to their field as well. Ironically, more number of diverse courses will stymie the development of a student in his or her interested field.
Students take up courses in universities in order to make a career out of it and hence, they should be adequately trained for it. Most organizations prefer candidates who are erudites in a field and therefore the students who give undivided focus to the courses related to the fields that they are interested in, will have a greater preference over those who juggle between various diverse courses as they do not share the same level of expertise as the former group of students. The students who opt for the courses of a field which interests them will also fare better than the others in the work place as well, as they will have a greater knowledge about the field than the others.
While there are some positive consequences of this policy as discussed above, there are some repercussions to this as well, like the inability of some student to be able to make a good career decision. Some students who are willing to opt for courses in universities waver between various career options, they might not have the maturity to make such a big decision and therefore, end up being influenced by their peers or society and opt for a course that they regret later in their lives. Hence, students must be well aware of the current trends in the world and various career options. Infact, the schools should take up the initiative of educating students with the career options available and provide personalised career counselling for each student, for them to make a good decision for their future.
Another big problem due to this policy can be the restricted options for students after graduation. If students are circumscribed to a restricted curriculum then they will not have a wide range of career options to explore. They will have to start from scratch if they want to switch to a different field. Hence, students should have basic rudimentary courses for various fields, so that they can easily opt for advanced courses if they wish to opt for a different career path.
Hence, this policy will have positive consequences if it is implemented with certain changes in the current education system.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...t. Most organizations prefer candidates who are erudites in a field and therefore the s...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... options for students after graduation. If students are circumscribed to a restric...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, so, then, therefore, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2252.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 465.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84301075269 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59287068305 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.423655913978 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 709.2 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.8877822532 60.3974514979 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.470588235 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3529411765 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88235294118 5.21951772744 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329592997124 0.243740707755 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134881565992 0.0831039109588 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.091015723933 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209596547631 0.150359130593 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12254181247 0.0667264976115 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.