Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The purpose of education is to provide a larger perception and knowledge on the subjects that students wish to pursue as part of their career and academics is concerned. Universities provide students with innumerable courses to opt for and pursue career in the specific fields of study. Nevertheless, some students might be inconsiderate and ambiguous while choosing the courses to progress further, with some relying on lucrative careers while other relying on their passion. However, the universities should encourage students to take courses within the fields of study of their interest rather making it as a requirement.
Firstly, the interest in the field of study allows one to explore beyond what is taught in the course. This acts as a driving force motivating an individual to perform better in his academics by achieving good grades in the course. For instance, a student has taken a course in the field of his interest, while another student has taken the course because of the lucrative options lying ahead in that specific field. However, without interest it is common to underperform in academics, which in the latter's case is simply unavoidable. Comparing both the above students, the one with the interest in the field has more possibility of achieving success in the field rather than the other with less interest. Therefore, universities should encourage students to learn what interests them.
Secondly, the student who learns with interest, will acquire more fundamental knowledge, which enables, him/her to get a high salaried jobs within their field of interest. For instance, a mechanical prospect with higher fundamental knowledge and practical skills on the automation and robotics, which is a sub branch of mechanical can become a automotive engineer and acquire higher paid jobs like in Tesla, electric automotive company. Similarly, a biology prospect can have better opportunities in becoming doctor, surgeon etc. based on their field of interest. Therefore, students should choose to study in the fields of their interest and Universities should encourage them in doing so.
However, there are specific uncommon situations where universities should allow students to take courses out of their field of interest, this is because, it should be a students choice to learn what he intends to with foreseeing the benefits in the career, even it is not very much interesting to learn. One might argue that some financially weak students should focus more on lucrative careers rather than pursuing what interests them. Nevertheless, if the financial insecurity is the problem, the student should avail better funding programs, which are created for the benefits of financially weak students to pursue education. There are several scholarships and schemes around the world, even the universities grant concession in the tuition fees to enable students to learn subjects of their interest. However, any field can become lucrative if the student's interest lie in it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'job'?
Suggestion: job
...enables, him/her to get a high salaried jobs within their field of interest. For ins...
^^^^
Line 5, column 343, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s a sub branch of mechanical can become a automotive engineer and acquire higher ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2527.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 471.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36518046709 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8445193986 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.443736730361 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 781.2 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7532185396 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.35 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.55 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241186772448 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940224864643 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067511313257 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16992595231 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0146907688583 0.0667264976115 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.