The value of works of art, whether they are literature, music, sculpture, or film, depends on how many people understand them.
The world we live in comprises of various forms of art, let it be literature, music or even film. Other than that our world also comprises of seven billion humans. Each of them have their own specific interests, characteristics, tastes regarding an abundance amount of topics. For example, let's consider music. An old person who has enjoyed music throughout his/her life might have a slight inclination towards a specific form of music. Let it be jazz, pop or even old school music. On the other hand, a young person may be interested in listening to rock or electric music. Thus, a song possessing certain qualities might be admired by some whereas at the same time it may not be enjoyed by the rest. This does not specifically mean that the song is not good. It only implies that a specific group of individuals who enjoy that form of music have endorsed it.
Speaking about all art forms in general, it can be said that not each individual has a liking towards all of them or even a few. Thus, the value of these fine works of art must not be measured by the overall sentiment of the public. A film or a song can be a hit if the desired audience for whom this was meant to be have loved it. The song 'Blinding Lights' by the famous artist, 'The Weekend' had created a buzz among the youngsters. At the same time, slightly older audience did not enjoy it as much. This in no way indicates that the people disliked it or were not able to understand it. This simply means that any work of art can be said to be understood if the desired audience towards whom it was intended has endorsed it.
Moreover, there are various other forms or art like paintings or sculptures which are admired by a huge number of people. But, only those who truly understand architecture or paintings are the ones who can judge these works of art. We as normal humans might find a sculpture to be very amusing on sighting it. But the pundits in that field may find it to be another ordinary piece of work.
Thus, on what basis can we say that a work of art is good or understood depends on what kind of art it is and also on the target audience. A mere person's statement regarding a piece of art who has no knowledge that form of art cannot be considered seriously. Only the reviews of the intended audience for whom a particular song was released or a film was made should be considered seriously. Also, a pundit's view on a certain work of art carries weightage when trying to understand if it is an excellent form of work or not.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
The world we live in comprises of various forms of art, let it be literat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...en film. Other than that our world also comprises of seven billion humans. Each of them have...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 147, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...and also on the target audience. A mere persons statement regarding a piece of art who ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas, for example, in general, kind of, speaking about, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2049.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 465.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4064516129 5.05705443957 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50145153837 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464516129032 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 644.4 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.8359775281 60.3974514979 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.96 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195571792428 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570351889127 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423129024003 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128857101239 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261372987446 0.0667264976115 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 14.1392134831 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 48.8420337079 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 12.1743820225 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.3 12.1639044944 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.