The video camera provides such an accurate and convincing record of contemporary life that it has become a more important form of documentation than written records.
Like the famous saying goes, seeing is believing, despite the believe of some people that a written record gives a more accurate account of happenings, a video recording gives an even better documentation. I personally believe that people would generally believe what they can see happening with their own eyes, whether it’s a live event, or a video recording of the event happening, over some written piece of documents be it in a newspaper, or a letter, or in books.
One example of videos been more accurate than written records is the George Floyd case, if the young lady hasn’t taken a recording of that event, the guilty officers might have colluded with the doctor in charge of the autopsy, to rule the death out as an accident instead of what it is, a murder, and falsify records. This is also comes into play in several other legal cases, for example when interrogating a suspect, supposedly the police officer had profiled the accused to be the criminal, instead of looking for evidence to support is assertation, the officer could go ahead to fill out a report on such issue, which is very unethical and wrong, and of course the report would be admissible in court, whereas a video recording would be a perfect, because it would show whether the accused confessed to the crime or not.
Now consider the case of the 7ft’1inch basketball god, Wilt Chamberlin. Wilt was arguably the best centre of his generation, he was mostly popular for his unprecedented feat of scoring a hundred point in an official game, the only person to ever come close to such remarkable effort is the late NBA legend, Kobe Byrant, with 81points. Of course, there are many concerns about Wilt’s 100-point game because it was never recorded on a video tape, it wasn’t even broadcasted on a radio, we really on written records on newspapers, and word of mouth from people that were supposedly present during the game, if video recording of such games had been taken, there wouldn’t be a single atom of doubt on anyone’s mind about it.
Finally, consider the Media industry, where there are a lot of controversial stories flying around, from who the most handsome celebrity is currently dating, the scandals such a celebrity is involved in, and all. Any decent journalist knows just merely writing it on paper isn’t enough, he/she needs hard evidences, and a video recording is the most single undisputable form of documentation of such events.
In sum, it is clear that a video recording provides a more accurate records of happening, compared to a written report. The George Floyd, the Wilt Chamberlin Case and the Media industry are all exception examples of Video recordings been more accurate documentations of events.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
Like the famous saying goes, seeing is believing, despite the believe of some people tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ying goes, seeing is believing, despite the believe of some people that a written record gi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
... goes, seeing is believing, despite the believe of some people that a written record gi...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'gif'?
Suggestion: gif
...ve of some people that a written record gives a more accurate account of happenings, ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, look, really, so, whereas, for example, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2273.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 461.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9305856833 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70814717188 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55748373102 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 716.4 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 23.0359550562 178% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 118.54454824 60.3974514979 196% => OK
Chars per sentence: 206.636363636 118.986275619 174% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.9090909091 23.4991977007 178% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342764509052 0.243740707755 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143941943859 0.0831039109588 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107537789049 0.0758088955206 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201348248883 0.150359130593 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0864999550382 0.0667264976115 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.7 14.1392134831 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 48.8420337079 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.3 12.1743820225 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 11.2143820225 164% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.7820224719 153% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.