As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Humans have questioned their surroundings, and the other things and have found relevant answers to it. This is due to constant learning and desire to figuring out the 'why'. I agree to a certain extent that gaining more knowledge leads to the topic being more convoluted and enigmatic rather than being more explainable.
To begin with, gaining more knowledge about a topic means one is diving deep into the subject and subsequently, it would get more complex than before. For example, basic elementary mathematics is difficult in the beginning. But, with some practice, one can overcome the problems and excel at it. As an individual moves to a university, he/she comes across more difficult level of mathematics which might include topics such as linear algebra, multivariable calculus and geometry. These topics are obviously difficult to comprehend and thus, it seems hard to understand at first. Further moving on the topic of mathematics, various engineering branches such as computer, mechanical and electrical engineering and non-engineering streams such as economics, architecture have mathematics as their foundation. At first, many of the wordly problems seemed to be arbitrary and mysterious in nature. But, with time and better understanding, humans are able to explain significant amount of laws of pure sciences governing the universe and employing the mathematics in the field of artificial intelligence.
Secondly, considering the subject matter of space, it is boundless and ever expanding. The outer space and celestial objects have always made humans pondered about their functioning. Many people have put forward various theories regarding space. At first, as more theories were stated, it did seem to better explain the complexities of the space. Rather, it also became more twisted than earlier. For an instance, the Earth was thought to be at the center of the universe until it was proven wrong by Galileo that the Sun is the center of our universe. Thus, there can be many theories which might be able to explain the intricracies of a topic, out of which some can be proven wrong or modified as we gain more knowledge.
On the other hand, as one gets a grasp on the topic, it does become more easy to explain the rudimentary things. To extend one of the previous examples, learning high level mathematics might seem daunting at first, but knowing it makes path to learn the process behind deriving basic formulaes of algebra and geometry. As we acquire more knowledge, the understanding of the easier topics becomes more clearer. As the humans are inquisitive in nature, gaining more knowledge will also lead to more questioning about a topic.
To sum up, as we get better in understanding the topic, it leads to things being complex and also comes along with new questions arising out of our understanding. Essentially, this is a never ending loop, where in the beginning the topic is difficult and it gradually becomes easier to explain more basic things as one gets more familiar with the subject.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 580, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
..., it seems hard to understand at first. Further moving on the topic of mathematics, var...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 397, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'clearer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: clearer
...erstanding of the easier topics becomes more clearer. As the humans are inquisitive in natur...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, such as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2548.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 495.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14747474747 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87790097981 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490909090909 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 797.4 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.911125585 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.166666667 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239042776918 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733749235161 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770295991721 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15682686637 0.150359130593 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291129323644 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.