"We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose
views contradict our own."; disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning."
We live among people whose thinking is various politically or academically. Some people would similar to your view, and others might assert your thinking as a fault. Which one would be useful to develop our thinking more creatively? I think there is no right answer to this question. The answer would be determined in accordance with what kind of knowledge you want to learn.
First and foremost, let’s suppose you are a competent politician supporting a policy of preserving an environment. If you want to learn more knowledge of positive effect about policies regulating the emission of CO2, it is fruitful to meet experts sharing your thoughts because they would provide you with useful information for your policy. However, you should meet people who oppose your thinking because it would cause serious side effect across all industry sectors. By these meeting, you would help you to understand a weak point of your policy and to be a capable politician. Likewise, you can learn from a various perspective beyond your opinion.
However, what if you are a graduate student interested in the greenhouse effect? Today, there are many laboratories in many institutions, universities. These research groups are operating for specific research subjects. In this condition, it is important that members in labs have common interests and goals for research work. For example, if you are working with people who contradict the Green House effect against you, it is difficult for you to advance research with these colleagues. In this case, with people sharing your view is helpful to progress your idea
What matters is trying to hear a various opinion. we need a diversity of opinion for developing our thinking more creative. There are always different views about a specific topic. What you have to do is to listen to another opinion about your topic whether one agrees with your view or not. Historically, people gathered together when they had to make an important decision or make policy. Sometimes the degree of usefulness might vary according to circumstance, but this approaching ultimately leads to advance your idea.
In conclusion, it is important to hear different opinions regardless of circumstance. The degree of usefulness of this hearing would change depending on what kind of job you have. However, ultimately various opinions about your topic would progress your idea positively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...kind of knowledge you want to learn. First and foremost, let's suppose y...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ous perspective beyond your opinion. However, what if you are a graduate stud...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iew is helpful to progress your idea What matters is trying to hear a various...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 51, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...rs is trying to hear a various opinion. we need a diversity of opinion for develop...
^^
Line 13, column 525, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... ultimately leads to advance your idea. In conclusion, it is important to hear d...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, likewise, so, for example, i think, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2041.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 387.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27390180879 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81002732439 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514211886305 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5817627166 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0416666667 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.125 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.45833333333 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10161027272 0.243740707755 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0346315818118 0.0831039109588 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414756745129 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0602032003803 0.150359130593 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343165400946 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.