Some people argue that successful leaders in government, industry, or other fields must be highly competitive. Other people claim that in order to be successful, a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others.Write a response in which you disc

Essay topics:

Some people argue that successful leaders in government, industry, or other fields must be highly competitive. Other people claim that in order to be successful, a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.

Any organization like government, industry, corporation needs a successful leader. Actually, many people have a different standard about what is a successful leader. How to choose between competitiveness and cooperation as the best trait of a successful leader? In particular, we should consider that organizations have a different trait. Hence, I think the most important virtue of a successful leader varies by types of organization.

Some people would argue that the most important factor of a successful leader is highly competitiveness like the ability to generate profit in business. It is a very reasonable argument considering economic factors are very important in this capitalist system. In particular, this virtue of leaders is important in business sectors. For example, if you were a manager of a McDonald branch, you should set a priority for generating a profit. Otherwise, employees of your branch might complain about your management skills and your branch management would be suffered a crisis. Therefore, most business sector would need to highly competitive leader who has an ability to make a profit.

However, there are more organizations need successful leaders than in business sectors like government, NGOs, even various clubs in school. Because these organization would not set a priority for making a profit, these members would not like a merely competitive leader. For example, although the CEO of a corporation has been shown an arrogant attitude toward employees, most employees prefer him if he has an outstanding management capacity. However, if this CEO were to be appointed as Prime Minister or government officer, many people would not support him fully because paying respect to members of a nation is an important trait for a civil servant. In this case, most members would like the cooperative leaders for their organization.

Furthermore, it is possible to commit a false dichotomy when we choose the virtues of successful leaders between competitiveness and cooperation. As I mentioned above, the virtues of good leaders are various depending on types of organization. For example, if you were a leader of ngos seeking to protect the environment, you would be a leader who has a strong conviction as an environmentalist. In some cases, those virtues are useless like competitiveness for generating a profit and cooperation for the administration of government.

In conclusion, various organizations would need to require successful leaders. However, the virtues of leaders are not restricted for between competitiveness and cooperation. Rather, The virtues of successful leaders are changeable depending on types of organizations.

Votes
Average: 6.2 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r who has an ability to make a profit. However, there are more organizations ne...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 149, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this organization' or 'these organizations'?
Suggestion: this organization; these organizations
..., even various clubs in school. Because these organization would not set a priority for making a p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve leaders for their organization. Furthermore, it is possible to commit a ...
^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for the administration of government. In conclusion, various organizations wou...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, for example, i think, in conclusion, in particular, in some cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2290.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 412.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55825242718 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32858948579 2.79657885939 119% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.444174757282 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 723.6 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7775539805 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.5652173913 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9130434783 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.34782608696 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199483292907 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713593521013 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488208687426 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132815291459 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350542805218 0.0667264976115 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 48.8420337079 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.