We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In our current society, it is debatable whether people learn more from people with similar perspectives or whether they learn more from the others with contraditory perspectives. I agree with the statement that we can learn significantly more from people who have opposite opinion.
Granted that people who share views with us might bestow more informations, in fact, we could learn much more from the people with contradictory views from us. Firstly, to elaborate, in the case of Thomas Edison, people learned much more from him, since he was a person with contradictory views from the contemporaries. The other scientists, at the time, made light bulb which was so expensive that only the moneyed could lighten their room at night. However, Edison determined to design relatively affordable and durable light bulb. Thanks to his opposite idea from the contemporaries, he could understand shortcomings of light bulb and come to achieve a remarkable success with his light bulb.
In addition, in society, especially in policy, people can learn more from the opposite views. The poliitic position of Honkong is a paragon of it. Honkong has been a autonomy city that has a opposite policy with China which is still a strict communism country. Despite their discripancy in policy, Hongcong and China has developed significantly more since they have contradictory policy. As we can see from two examples above, it is more compelling that people learn much more from the contraditory views of their own.
In brief, having a opposite views from the others might bestow more information to the one. Therefore I would like to suggest people to think and see more differently from others than now they do.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ng is a paragon of it. Honkong has been a autonomy city that has a opposite polic...
^
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...nkong has been a autonomy city that has a opposite policy with China which is sti...
^
Line 7, column 18, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...views of their own. In brief, having a opposite views from the others might be...
^
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ght bestow more information to the one. Therefore I would like to suggest people to think...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, so, still, therefore, in addition, in brief, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 2235.4752809 64% => OK
No of words: 278.0 442.535393258 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13669064748 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83704194498 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 215.323595506 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496402877698 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 704.065955056 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4238289561 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.0 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375145804767 0.243740707755 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146113085797 0.0831039109588 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117544281798 0.0758088955206 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249381706932 0.150359130593 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569115052394 0.0667264976115 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 100.480337079 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.