"We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own; disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning."
The crux of the topic is that people learn more by shearing the same views rather than criticize the idea. I personally opposed the idea and going to provide different examples to bolster my stance.
First of all, people have different knowledge and understanding of the same subjects and it is only natural to express disparate views on a subject. Contradictory views on subjects are helpful and buttress an argument. Same views on an argument, without any opposition, are making the points of subjects facile. For example, some construction company got a project and there are many ways to do the work. IF only employees with same views discussion on the design of the building, they might not find the faults and stuck on a point, overall the quality of the construction might harm. Employees with an opposite view when they have the argument they can find out the mistakes they had made and that actually expedite the construction work.
Similarly, a proper discussion essential for a democratic country. It is important for the opposition to ask the question to the establishment and be critical about every policy. A contradictory view on a can strengthen democracy and the system. The government also should welcome any form of criticism and should understand that criticism actually help to lucid the process of government planning. Same views in a government can create a facade and actually harm the government, as obsequious points only create fascism.
People might argue that different views can sometimes create a bedlam and it is impossible to satisfy everyone and discern and corrected mistakes are impossible when affluent people have different views. A group with many contradictory views only create stress and the duration of work can only be lengthened. In the name of political debate and with our 21st-century journalism it is only ruckus running in the discussion on television shows. But, still, contradictory view and debate is the best form of learning and essential for education and sports. For example, on a specific subject with different views can actually solve the disparity on the topic. Similarly, in sports, different people discuss a strategy that helps the team to perform better. For example, in the field of cricket, different batsman understands bowler in a different way, and when they discuss how to play them it actually helps in the field.
At the end of the epilogue, I would say that different and opposite views are important for any field as long as they do not create confusion. Different views can protract the range of knowledge and bust the bubble of dogmatic views of the argument.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: ASK_THE_QUESTION[1]
Message: Use simply 'ask' instead.
Suggestion: ask
.... It is important for the opposition to ask the question to the establishment and be critical ab...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 830, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...t, different batsman understands bowler in a different way, and when they discuss how to play them...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, similarly, so, still, then, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2204.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 437.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04347826087 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82224050118 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453089244851 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 677.7 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0786846712 60.3974514979 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.181818182 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8636363636 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86363636364 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183893487375 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660352042192 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578024078852 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11727677164 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256625676824 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.