Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The crux of the topic is that teachers' salaries should be based on according to the academic performance of their students. I disagree with the argument for the following reasons and going to provide examples to bolster my stance.
First of all, teaching is considered as a noble profession but teaching is not a lucrative job. Professors are the most underrated comparing to other professions. Overall, salaries according to the performance of the students are unjust to the teacher, because then a senior professor might get a lower salary than a junior. For example, in a class, a senior professor taught organic chemistry and one junior professor taught a basic literature subject. Organic chemistry harder than a basic subject, and also get a high score in a difficult is also tough. So, according to the topic even if the teacher did his best he might get a lower salary than the junior professor.
The topic is also opaque because on what touchstone the academic performance of a student will be measured, is it measured by a single exam or series of exams. It might be possible that in a certain exam a particular paper was tough, then the whole class was performed poorly. Then, even though the teacher was not responsible for the desultory performance of the students, but then at the end of the day his salary suffered.
There is also a possibility that by implementing this argument the teacher and students both suffer. For example, when the salary matter then teachers incline towards facile or basic subjects which were easy to score and no one is going to teach enigmatic subjects. Professors might also get languid and apathetic to students as salaries are not stable and there might not be an increment on salary. On the other hand, students might misuse this opportunity, for example, if some students do not happy with a particular teacher, they might deliberately perform below mediocre. So, ultimately the teacher and students' relationship suffered.
On the other hand, some people might argue that being competitive might help teachers to perform better and motivate them to help students to get a high score. Then all the study will be marks centered and no one talk about innovation or extracurricular activities and students will be vapid. Overall when the teaching and salaries based solely on the score the teachers force their students to perform better and that might harm young might and might have an adverse effect.
At the epilogue of the topic, I would say that salary and academic performance should not depend on each other. If this kind of hypotheses applied teachers more feel like a salesman, who have their targets to reach by anyhow. We should try to reach rapport between teacher and students, only by better understanding both can perform better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 530, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[2]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...c subject, and also get a high score in a difficult is also tough. So, according to the top...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, as to, for example, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2328.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 470.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95319148936 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70521184349 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459574468085 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 731.7 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7326122102 60.3974514979 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.818181818 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181896191858 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630405214017 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463081111914 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114063490877 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462308589119 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.