We learn through direct experience; to accept a theory without experiencing it is to learn nothing at all.
We, human beings start to learn things at a very tender age when we were born navie in this world clueless of any process, due to our daily encounters with the world seeing and learning how to handle and manage suitaions we learn. This oberserving and learning is called learn by experience.It is rightly said that experience is the greatest teacher and we learn through the suitaions we encounter each day.
Expriences have given has wider and better prospects towards any suitaions and it is accpected that experience is the best teacher. For instance if we want to learn how to drive a car or use a mobile phone what is the most prefered way of doing it? Is it getting first hand experience of it or by reading the guide again and again? True we will learn a lot of things about the structre of the car horsepower of the engine but when it comes on how to drive a car it's a different story. Unless and until we encounter various suitaions and different traffic problems we cannot understand truely how to drive a car. Similarly the case for mobile phone unless and until we touch and use the mobile phone it is quite impossible toperfectly run it. Hence we need to have the experience of practically doing the thing to understand fully the working of anything and perfect learning comes through experience.
When we accept a theory without applying it in real world, we learn less. It cannot be said that we learn nothing. Since there can be various suitaions which have a very less chance of happening and can be extremely dangerous so we need to learn therotcially or by reading abourt such cases and be preapred for the problem to act on it. A mangement student during his course of education is taught about various types of a loss a company suffers and how to counter those problems according to the market suitaion. The student while working in a company never wishes to face such crisis that his company face losses but in worse case if they do happen he needs to be ready to face such problems. Hence knowing the theory about a particular problem can make us preapre about the condition forehand. Therefore we cannot say that learning a theroy is learning nothing at all.
A perfect mixture about learning can be made out of mixture of practical learning and theortical learning together. We can apply both the aspects of learning to find the best way to learn and move ahead. For instance our education system is vaguely based on this concept. From the intinal stages only we are provided a larger amount of theory and a susequent amount of practical knowledge with it. Our schools have classrooms where we read a concept theoritically and labs where we can apply that theortical knowledge and gain practical knowledge of it. Though in our scholling system major focus is based on theortical knowledge and less importance is given to practical knowledge. Hence we need to find a perfect amalgum to both of these methods and find the best way to make perfect learning.
Therefore from this discussion we can conclude that experience is the greatest teacher but it would be wrong to say that learning a theory without experiencing it is learning not at all. We can achieve perfect learning only via a possible combination of both.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
... learning is called learn by experience.It is rightly said that experience is the ...
^^
Line 3, column 463, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...but when it comes on how to drive a car its a different story. Unless and until we ...
^^^
Line 3, column 613, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...t understand truely how to drive a car. Similarly the case for mobile phone unless and un...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 743, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...is quite impossible toperfectly run it. Hence we need to have the experience of pract...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 882, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
... of anything and perfect learning comes through experience. When we accept a theory ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 696, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...eeds to be ready to face such problems. Hence knowing the theory about a particular p...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 798, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...s preapre about the condition forehand. Therefore we cannot say that learning a theroy is...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 684, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...rtance is given to practical knowledge. Hence we need to find a perfect amalgum to bo...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...e best way to make perfect learning. Therefore from this discussion we can conclude th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, similarly, so, therefore, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 33.0505617978 185% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2682.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 571.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69702276708 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88831323574 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58394657727 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.437828371278 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 825.3 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9950997499 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.28 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.84 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.72 5.21951772744 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396941197847 0.243740707755 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128845170289 0.0831039109588 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129467014582 0.0758088955206 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255763382056 0.150359130593 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0864069698218 0.0667264976115 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 48.8420337079 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.