The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The issue addresses a controversial topic of relationship between the wellbeing of society and the decisions of authority, questioned by substantial number of people. While I generally believe that incorporation of public opinions and ideas in governmental decision forms the basis of democracy and enhances the well-being of the country, I assert, that such questioning should be proceeded in a civilized way, to allow different factions to come to the common agreement, beneficial for all sides.
Well being of society has always been a priority for any authority all the times. Indeed, it is hard to imagine a government or a leader who is not inspired with idealistic images of thriving nation under his leadership. In their pursuit to achieve a harmony in society, different governments adopt various strategies. While democratic governments prefer to always monitor the public opinions and base their future steps on the major public concerns, the autocratic regimes prefer to follow their private interests and in general, ignoring the popular opinions. Independently of the type of regime, it is impossible to achieve a full consensus between the government and its citizens. Therefore, the general public will always be questioning and opposing the authority's actions, what matters is how this opposition manifests itself and whether is able to achieve the desired results will least consequences for well being of the country.
The rigorius opposing to an unpopular decision and inability to compromise both by government and public could lead to upheaval of violence, deleterious for the well being of the society. The history knows plenty examples when the lack of competence from the central authority instigated the public protests, that transformed into a civil war. For example, the inability of British Colonial government to compromise whit its American colonies on the taxes lead to the War for Independence. As a consequence, the Britain got deprived of its most prolific colony and the overall well-being of both nations declined. Thus, the civilized debates and consensus is the preferred way to question the decisions of government, ensuring the well-being of the country stays intact.
However, there is quite a high probability that the government, assured in its superiority and power, would be reluctant to debate with the rest of the nation, thus provoking unrest. Therefore, one might refrain from questioning the decisions of government in order to avoid any type of political confrontation. Form the historical perspective, while this strategy might preserve the general well-being of the country for some time, it is prone to development of the authoritarian government, whose decisions are only intended to support thriving of a minor clique of people in power. This kind of government will do the best to make a appearance of thriving nation while hiding the pending societal problems, as it is happens in North Korea nowadays. In this case, questioning and opposing authorities is a necessary step to ensure the well-being for future generation.
To conclude, I contend that well-being of the nation is strictly depends on the authority's decisions. Some of these decisions, which can be deleterious for thriving of the society must be questioned by general public. But one needs to demonstrate caution while opposing the authority, to avoid any kind of violence and unrest. Only via debates and discussions the sides can achieve a consensus, beneficial for well-being of the nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 392, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a civilized way" with adverb for "civilized"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...at such questioning should be proceeded in a civilized way, to allow different factions to come to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...greement, beneficial for all sides. Well being of society has always been a ...
^^^
Line 4, column 701, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...rnment and its citizens. Therefore, the general public will always be questioning and opposing...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 884, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'will the least'.
Suggestion: will the least
... is able to achieve the desired results will least consequences for well being of the coun...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 635, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... of government will do the best to make a appearance of thriving nation while hid...
^
Line 10, column 203, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ng of the society must be questioned by general public. But one needs to demonstrate caution w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in general, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2978.0 2235.4752809 133% => OK
No of words: 554.0 442.535393258 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37545126354 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.85151570047 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04563294659 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 278.0 215.323595506 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501805054152 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 944.1 704.065955056 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.2883192159 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.363636364 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1818181818 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.81818181818 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178990508519 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589546481322 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413388578681 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113472370604 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282652366085 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 165.0 100.480337079 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.