The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It is not wisdom but authority that makes a law. If the law is good enough then the people of the country will get benefited, but if the law is not good for the people, then they will suffer very badly. The speaker of the argument states that the well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority. I completely agree with the point, because if only one person raises voice against unfairness, we can see the difference in the laws, likewise when many people question authority, it is obvious that well being of the society will enhanced.
Firstly, when people question their authority, they feel somewhere doubted about the authority. And if one people raised the voice against the bad thing then, many people of the same thinking come forward to bolster that one man. It is always better to have many people than one to take some steps to improve our society. Moreover, when we question our authority, the members of the authority, have to give us proofs against our claim. This makes the people having a clear insight into the process and nothing is hidden from them. For instance, if there is corruption in government schemes, it is better to ask leaders where they have spent the funds and how much. Hence they have to provide proofs against this and they will be punished if some malfunctioning found.
Additionally, from many decades women's are considered suitable to only household chores, but unless some people raise questions against this, the womens will don't have the status they have today in our society. Today women have the same right of equality to work like men. And there is huge contribution of the women, in every field today, from household chores to technological advancement. For example, in the USA, one of the most developed nations in the world, women are deprived to vote for a long time. But after lots of effort, they have secured women suffrage, in the late 19th century. Therefore, for the enhancement of society, it is good to question.
However, those who question the authority are often perceived as iconoclast and heretic, nevertheless, questioning often gives out the unexpected results and contributes to our understanding of the world. In the past, Galileo was persecuted for questioning the Heliocentric theory, sun and other planet revolves around the Earth. But his prediction that the Earth revolves around the Sun has debunked many myths in the past and was seminal in advancing our understanding of the Physics.
In conclusion, it is good to question authority, if questioning against authority can be beneficial to society. If people have doubts in there mind against authority, and they didn't ask questions then the laws, procedures will be as it is for a long period and hence everyone will suffer. But if people raise questions against the laws and procedures, they can be improved and people will get benefit from it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 558, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'enhance'
Suggestion: enhance
...ous that well being of the society will enhanced. Firstly, when people question the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 666, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...they have spent the funds and how much. Hence they have to provide proofs against thi...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 159, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...questions against this, the womens will dont have the status they have today in our ...
^^^^
Line 17, column 177, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... there mind against authority, and they didnt ask questions then the laws, procedures...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, likewise, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2426.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 492.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93089430894 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70967865282 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6400459629 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469512195122 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 754.2 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6659285206 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.47826087 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3913043478 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17391304348 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191856360791 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06858285939 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697147019852 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12026346374 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606524239959 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.