The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
A lot of people assert that question the authority will help to enhance the well-being of a society, however, it depends on the decisions the authority make. A good advice could have positive result, on the contrary, to give suggestions blindly will harm the society.
When authority made some false decision, if many people questioned it and made some improvement, the well-being of a society will be enhanced. It is impossible that the authority never make mistakes, and the people sometimes are the supervisor. One good example is the Roosevelt’s new deal. During the great depression, the president Hoover enacted several policies in order to save the whole nation. However, because he did not find the key cause of the great depression, the situation did not improve even worsen. Many people questioned his decisions and asked someone else to solve the problem. Then, the president Roosevelt came to the stage. He published a series of policies and saved the whole country. Because of him, the United States could develop again. This example illustrates that if people discover the mistakes of authority and question them, the society will improved.
However, not all questioning will bring out the positive result, on the contrary, many people question the authority will make the society disorder because sometimes the authority is right. Once many people aggregate, it is possible the riot will happen. We could learn it from the recent example happened during Covid-19. In the United States, the government asked people to stay at home in order to reduce the contagion, but people were refused. Lots of people came to street and pushed the government to change the policy. Some even damaged the cars and stores along the street. During the parade, the crime rate is increased. Many people stole things and robbed the pedestrian. Can we say the question of authority bring out a positive result? Probably not.
To make an improvement, when authority is truly wrong then people could question it and also people have to regulate the level of parade. Sometimes the authority’s policy will hurt a group of people’s interest, but it unavoidable since they cannot make perfect decisions. People ought to identify whether the policy is beneficial or deleterious rather than question it blindly. Moreover, when people decide to make a parade in order to attack attention, a leader is indispensable. Without proper regulation, a parade will have counterproductive result. As we could seen in the Roosevelt’s example, a good suggestion from the public could make the whole nation prosperous.
In a nutshell, people should have critical thinking on authority. Question the authority blindly and make a chaotic parade is inadvisable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 877, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'improve'
Suggestion: improve
...ity and question them, the society will improved. However, not all questioning will b...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 566, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have seen' or 'see'?
Suggestion: have seen; see
...e counterproductive result. As we could seen in the Roosevelt’s example, a good sugg...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, then, well, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2309.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 442.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22398190045 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79924603098 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481900452489 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 740.7 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.99550561798 260% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0564406411 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.6206896552 118.986275619 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2413793103 23.4991977007 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.24137931034 5.21951772744 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175677938215 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481425370229 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508172573811 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111453950179 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278751607969 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.4 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.