The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
History is always faced with break points through revolutions and enlightments generally by erudite segment of the society. To some extent, questioning authority just prompts in chaotic environment, followlingly, the society ends up with discordance in an unfortunate way. In fact, historical record points out that questioning authority is a result aroused from overlooked critics of members of the society, that is to say, it is not an incentive for chaos, it is actually the consequence of the extant chaos.
Creating order in the society requires retaining some rights which can lead to disobedience. Most dictatorships regulat laws which are address to forestall freedom of speech and counterparties in order to quarantee their sovereign. Questioning these laws will cause to raise the awareness and unanimity within society. As with the most cases, dictatorhships have been enervated by the occupations of these rebellions. For instance, in the India Revolution, Ghandi is the precursor of the revolution with an aim of equal rights for everyone. Additionally, the most magnificient feature of his approach is his thoughts about violence. Most rebellions think violence is an inevitable method in order to force their regime but Ghandi had never advocated this attitude. In the light of this, his innocuous way of fighting for their rights has diffused rapidly to several countries. Their aim has got far bigger than they have expected.
Furthermore, authority is a figure which is mainly in favor of staying intractable and dominant, in contrast, questioning and investigatin has always brought about answers with changes which ameliorate or aggravate current situation dependently. In political history, we observe that modest societies has changed their regime into more democratic and modern systems through questioning authorities. For instance, during the Ottoman Empire, Ataturk has fight for indepence from imperial forces, the suffrage of the women, increasing literati among people and changing alphabet according to necessity of other parts of the world. All these inverventions has initiated a system called Republic of Turkey which had got rid of all boundaries and capitulations to its alliances. In sum, this also illustrates that questioning authority has opened doors of a secular and developed country for the Turkey rather than modest and illiterate society.
On the other hand, no one can deny that there are illustrations which support that the well-being of a society is not always enhanced when many of its people question authority. For instance, in the Arabic Spring, unionizing against Mubarek has caused hazardous dichotomies, impecuniaries related to dispose of help from outside and internal strife. Hence, we cannot ensure that questioning authority will certainly facilitate the needs of the society.
All things considered, well-being of the society is always feeded from consensus among society. To illustrate, as long as there is balance between the rights of the society and the heads, we will observe a more healthy system. Otherwise, erudite people has to reckon on solutions in order to ameliorate the system by questioning or suggesting resolutions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 251, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an unfortunate way" with adverb for "unfortunate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...y, the society ends up with discordance in an unfortunate way. In fact, historical record points out ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'raising'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: raising
...eign. Questioning these laws will cause to raise the awareness and unanimity within soci...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecursor of the revolution with an aim of equal rights for everyone. Additionally,...
^^
Line 4, column 110, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g intractable and dominant, in contrast, questioning and investigatin has always ...
^^
Line 4, column 494, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ight for indepence from imperial forces, the suffrage of the women, increasing li...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, hence, if, look, so, well, as to, for instance, in contrast, in fact, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2715.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 492.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51829268293 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70967865282 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03733556432 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542682926829 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 851.4 704.065955056 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3926911009 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.043478261 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3913043478 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95652173913 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229600678224 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604915402367 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117868350781 0.0758088955206 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147602949052 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12327353923 0.0667264976115 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 151.0 100.480337079 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.