"For the past year, as part of an effort to broaden our supporter base, our Folk on the Air program has allocated less time to traditional American folk music and more time to Latino music and world music. In recent months, many long-term supporters of our station have written to complain about what they describe as the un-American bias of the program. In addition, the local newspaper has published a recent editorial critical of our shift in programming. Therefore, in order to forestall any further adverse publicity for the station and to avoid the loss of additional listener-supporters, we should discontinue our current emphasis on Latino and world music and restore the time devoted to traditional American folk music to its former level."
The statements adverts about a claim that their shifting from American folk music to Latin and world music. They suggest turning back to previous program due to complaint and critics, however, there are some missing informations and doubtful facts hence before taking any action they should reckon on these first.
Firstly, one possible explanation to regard is that these complaints may come from American partizans, that is, they may plan to urge people to inhibit a situation of playing Latin music on a public American radio. As we expect, Latin Americans should not be so dissatisfied with such a sympathetic and thoughtful decision of respecting their music, by extension, it is more likely to be that these may be strategies of American partizans.
Second possible explanation worth to consider is that this complaints may be from other radio stations, rivals. In fact, there are various instances that competition leads to spread fake news, complaints to create a bad reputation in public, accordingly, others may want to interrupt and prevent from taking advantage of such indulgent and generious attitude of this station. For instance, many detergent firms create fake profiles online to give negative feedbacks and sometimes they really get successful in misjudgement and prejudice in consumer minds.
Last logical fallacy is that these complaints may cover merely small group of people, in this case, it is not big deal to neglect these negative occasions. To illustrate, there is an overlooked calculation that there may be %5 increased complaints and even loss but %30 increase in their listeners, this case reveal that sometimes it is rational to pursue on current policy rather than following few listeners of bad judgements.
My recommendation is that they should conduct a research on profiles of these listeners and investigate elaboratively in order to clarify possibility of rivals and manipulation of American partizans. In additions, they should make a cost and benefit analysis on recent recordings of changes in listeners.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'advert'.
Suggestion: advert
The statements adverts about a claim that their shifting from ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y come from American partizans, that is, they may plan to urge people to inhibit ...
^^
Line 9, column 47, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...ommendation is that they should conduct a research on profiles of these listeners and inve...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...der to clarify possibility of rivals and manipulation of American partizans. In a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, may, really, second, so, for instance, in addition, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.6327345309 81% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 28.8173652695 118% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 55.5748502994 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 2260.96107784 77% => OK
No of words: 324.0 441.139720559 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36419753086 5.12650576532 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90865874358 2.78398813304 104% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 204.123752495 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595679012346 0.468620217663 127% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 705.55239521 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 19.7664670659 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.8473053892 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.0135550071 57.8364921388 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.0 119.503703932 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4545454545 23.324526521 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8181818182 5.70786347227 190% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0995126765765 0.218282227539 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044186149849 0.0743258471296 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648411274052 0.0701772020484 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.058228753277 0.128457276422 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521145667092 0.0628817314937 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 14.3799401198 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 48.3550499002 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.197005988 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.4 12.5979740519 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.32208582834 118% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 98.500998004 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.1389221557 122% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.