The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority
The issue cleary states that the development of society would enhance when people question authority regarding any issue which is not done by the authority.
Firstly it is always better when people speak up their issue with the authority they have every right to question them.For example a politician who is not the person who is capable of having an authority and he is a criminal person yet no law could stop him to become a cheif minister though people haven't voted him he has done a scam that all the votes would fall under him in the ballet.The results were declared him as the person who is the most corrupted and criminal person yet not even a single person questions the authority because they have the fear what would happen for them.If this continues then in future any thief can also rule the state so high time that people wake-up and question the authority.
Secondly the well-being of a society also comes from unity of the people who comes together to question the authority for example if a single person goes and complaints about the water clogs on roads when it rains heavily when just one resident questions the authority they say that no one else complained other than you so they just neglect it and this leads to damage of roads then there is no use of people blaming authority in the last minute about the difficulties caused by them because if they would have questioned them before they wouldn't have faced this at the end.
Finally the speaker concludes that people should always question authority at the right time when they need the better society and brings a better enhancement in society for future generations
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
... they have every right to question them.For example a politician who is not the per...
^^^
Line 5, column 300, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...o become a cheif minister though people havent voted him he has done a scam that all t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...otes would fall under him in the ballet.The results were declared him as the person...
^^^
Line 5, column 587, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: If
...ave the fear what would happen for them.If this continues then in future any thief...
^^
Line 9, column 502, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had questioned'?
Suggestion: had questioned
...iculties caused by them because if they would have questioned them before they wouldnt have faced thi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 541, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... would have questioned them before they wouldnt have faced this at the end. Finall...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...ouldnt have faced this at the end. Finally the speaker concludes that people shoul...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 58.6224719101 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 2235.4752809 61% => OK
No of words: 288.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75694444444 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33118287147 2.79657885939 83% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 215.323595506 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503472222222 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 704.065955056 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 20.2370786517 20% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 72.0 23.0359550562 313% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 240.34870501 60.3974514979 398% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 342.5 118.986275619 288% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 72.0 23.4991977007 306% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 22.75 5.21951772744 436% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325427670595 0.243740707755 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.238538438039 0.0831039109588 287% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592799265002 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238538438039 0.150359130593 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592799265002 0.0667264976115 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 37.0 14.1392134831 262% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 6.86 48.8420337079 14% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 30.2 12.1743820225 248% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.51 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.38706741573 115% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 100.480337079 45% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 28.5 11.8971910112 240% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 30.8 11.2143820225 275% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 31.0 11.7820224719 263% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.