The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Human history is flush with rebellion and dissent. The world as we know it today was created in many respects by the brave mavericks who questioned the authority of their time. When these dissidents are victorious in the fight for their grievances, authority is forced to concede or be overthrown. It is these watershed moments that truly shape history forever.
Take the American colonists in 1776 as a prime example. When faced with the oppression of the British monarchy, they did not remain indolent and passively submit to the tyranny they were subject to. Instead, they united together and fought for their independence. If they didn’t have the courage to fight back against an oppressive authority, colonists across the 13 colonies would still have been subject to the egregious taxes and whims of the monarchy. This dissension was not only beneficial then, but helped establish one of the most powerful and prosperous countries in the world today which fights to maintain peace and order throughout the world.
However, dissension is not always beneficial. Take for example, the Communist Revolution in Russia in the early 20th century. While overthrowing the czar and his government was intended to provide equality and prosperity among the the impoverished proletariat, it instead brought more poverty. The governments of Lenin and Stalin later proved to be possibly more oppressive than the previous rule. Not only was the Russian Communist revolution far from the improvement it had promised the Russian people, but actually a tragic step backwards from the rule of the czar.
Further expanding on the failures of the Communist revolution, no class in society was safe. Lenin and the other Communist leaders promised justice for the working class, but at the expense of the middle and upper classes. In fact, anyone with even an iota of wealth was executed upon the Communists coming to power. Clearly, in this case rebellion against an oppressive authority was good for no level of society.
Finally, even in a civilized democratic nation such as the United States dissent is not always what is best for society. Take for example, the recent issue of COVID-19. As new research was being conducted and new regulations were being enacted based on that, these regulations were being violently protested all across America. Not only did this prevent the virus from being contained, but may have in fact caused it to spread at a more rapid rate. When decisive action is required, inciting protest may not be the best idea for society.
In conclusion, dissent against authority has its time and place. Certainly, throughout history it has been necessary to oppose tyrannic rule such as the American Revolution. However, in some historical cases such as the Communist Russian Rebellion, it has produced drastic results. Considering this, and the fact that rebellion sometimes precludes decisive action when necessary, questioning authority negatively impacts the well-being of society overall.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...o provide equality and prosperity among the the impoverished proletariat, it instead br...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...o provide equality and prosperity among the the impoverished proletariat, it instead br...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 2, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
... backwards from the rule of the czar. Further expanding on the failures of the Commun...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, however, if, may, so, still, then, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2533.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 482.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25518672199 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72460989481 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545643153527 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 792.0 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.3946943777 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8148148148 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8518518519 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2962962963 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133637884918 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0358615235829 0.0831039109588 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324464659613 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0694493462425 0.150359130593 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275671993342 0.0667264976115 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 100.480337079 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.