When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings

Essay topics:

When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings

In the modern life, many new things supplant their old likes. For example, modern communication ways have supplanted the previous ones, modern vehicles substituted the older transportation ways, and for sure, modern buildings substitute the older. In the case of old buildings, while some opinions suggest that keeping them as part of the history of the place and shape the identity of the area they occupy, others suggest that modern buildings are more suitable for the contemporary life purposes.
first, when thinking about buildings and planning of cities, we have to consider various aspects. For instance, we must consider how economically beneficial modern buildings are, and that advanced countries always have in our minds the image of high and luxury towers. A country having the opportunity of constructing an area that is full of such high buildings, must consider the idea of implementing that, as it will be very attractive for economists to visit and invest in such city.
Furthermore, in the mean time of the world, one of the biggest issues countries face is the traffic. The copious amount of vehicles in any city urges a precise planning of the building, which is unattainable where old buildings exist, as they were not built with the consideration of such advancement in the transportation industry.
Finally, as there is now more safety taken into consideration when constructing any building, this level and quality of the safety cannot be achieved in the older constructions.
In conclusion, we first have to think about how old a building is, and how important its existence will be beneficial for the identity and history of the place. we understand that it also may be attractive for tourism for a city having very old buildings. Otherwise, modern building are way more suitable for the modern life purposes, such as economics, traffic and safety.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e for the contemporary life purposes. first, when thinking about buildings and...
^^^^
Line 2, column 5, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...r the contemporary life purposes. first, when thinking about buildings and plan...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sts to visit and invest in such city. Furthermore, in the mean time of the wor...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ement in the transportation industry. Finally, as there is now more safety tak...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... achieved in the older constructions. In conclusion, we first have to think ab...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 167, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
... the identity and history of the place. we understand that it also may be attracti...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 306.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14052287582 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91210945488 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52614379085 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2157743991 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.083333333 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.21951772744 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303716660403 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118098999033 0.0831039109588 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075280507131 0.0758088955206 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15919034761 0.150359130593 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101767357558 0.0667264976115 153% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.