Write a response in which you discuss the extent to
which you agree or disagree with the recommendation
and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In
developing and supporting your position, describe
specific circumstances in which adopting the
recommendation would or would not be advantageous
and explain how these examples shape your position.
In any field or enterprise, revitalization is vital. Things that are learnt in the current generation must be passed on to the next blooming one to ensure a bright and thriving future.
Now coming to the main claim, in some disciplines like math and physics, most of the research output culminates between 20's and 30's. In contrary, people in the fields like politics and business tend to improve with age as these require a considerable amount of practice and experience.
Well, it is important for those in any position to step down and let the new comers take over. The exact duration for which the people should stay in power varies. In some scenarios, it is not always possible to find a replacement for the person in power. In some cases, the efficacy of the leadership might decline with the time as the tasks seem like a trite after a period of time and people begin to loose interest which is detrimental to bot the enterprise and to the career of the person. In such cases it is inevitable to change the leadership in some time period. this time period could be a couple of months of a senator at school to several years of minister's/president's term. Nevertheless, people have their own way of choosing a leader that best delivers their interests and this need not be supervised. We have seen some countries with maximum upper bound for a presidential term and others with indefinite term.
I believe that any enterprise tends to do what is best suited for its success and one critical part of this is the choice and delegate the leadership. The amount of time after which the delegation should occur is guided a formula that is derived from the factors directly or indirectly affected by the enterprise. This said, there should be no hard limit on the duration of a person's power in the organization. If there is a limit indeed, it will only benefit the organizations which have or will tend to have a 5 year upper bound derived from their respective formulas and it will only serve as baleful for the organizations for which the formula leads to a bigger term.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 370, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... as the tasks seem like a trite after a period of time and people begin to loose interest whic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 405, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[3]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...er a period of time and people begin to loose interest which is detrimental to bot th...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 496, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...rprise and to the career of the person. In such cases it is inevitable to change t...
^^
Line 5, column 573, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...nge the leadership in some time period. this time period could be a couple of months...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, so, well, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 367.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6757493188 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7605636049 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525885558583 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7434000017 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.25 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9375 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5625 5.21951772744 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0921807312587 0.243740707755 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.028842922584 0.0831039109588 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311830709057 0.0758088955206 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0430924529626 0.150359130593 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365975605633 0.0667264976115 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.