Schools should do more to prepare students for the non-academic aspects of adulthood.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation
and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and sup porting your position, be sure
to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
School plays a significant role in development of student from early age. Schools are essential to provide students with discipline and knowledge required to know this world better as well as also develop their interest in few topics. Schools teaches multifarious subjects like science, mathematics, history, geography and many more, so this preamble of each topic can help them in better understanding of the topic of their choice.
But, is this academic subject are sufficient for everyone to choice there future in adulthood? We have heard this quote a lot many time – “Every child is different”. Is it correct for schools to constraint their curriculum that fits in the need of every student? Sometimes, this academic aspect taught in school is not enough for few students.
For instance, in 2000’s in India most of the schools focused on academic aspects and thus students faced problem when they reach their adulthood. Problems like, very few career choices they had, example either Engineer, Doctor, Lawyer or CA based on their majors in high school. Whereas, if we see India of 2019, schools started focusing on non-academic aspects along with academics and thus, students have a spectrum of choices, like music, dance, sports etc. other than their academics.
Home is the first school. Non-academic aspects should start from home also. Sometimes academic pressure is burdensome for students and parents obscure to see other talent in their child. Therefore, sometimes parents instead of pressurizing students to just study and get good grades and become a rank holder in class, they can bolster their child to pursue what they can excel and help them to get proper coaching or training at an early age.
As above all points, are in favor of the claim that Schools should do more to prepare students for the non-academic aspects of adulthood. But there are loopholes in every aspect, if school focus more on non-academic aspect than students might lack in academic knowledge. Thus, weak foundation of each subject will be laid. Non-academic activities are such that it can be developed outside school also, by the help of parents, peers and trainers. But academic aspects can mostly be developed in school.
According to the claim, I talked about both minimal and moderate intervention of school in non-academic aspect. I would like to conclude that, school should include non-academic activities to certain extend that does not hamper their primary goal, as well as, help in overall development of students for adulthood.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'many times'.
Suggestion: many times
...ulthood? We have heard this quote a lot many time – 'Every child is different'....
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 71, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...academic aspects should start from home also. Sometimes academic pressure is burdens...
^^^^
Line 11, column 202, Rule ID: SOME_EXTEND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'extent' ("extent" is a noun, "extend" is a verb)?
Suggestion: extent
...lude non-academic activities to certain extend that does not hamper their primary goal...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2151.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 412.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22087378641 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7265169302 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54854368932 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.5519653353 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7727272727 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7272727273 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261433290807 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0981030457921 0.0831039109588 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737419043012 0.0758088955206 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156309011563 0.150359130593 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597197205079 0.0667264976115 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.