The bar charts and line graph below show the results of a survey conducted over a three-year period to discover what people who live in London think of the city.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates what people thought are the best aspects of living in London over a three-year period.
A cursory glance at the diagram is enough to make it clear that the proportion of people considering museums and art galleries as well as transport as the best things increased throughout the period shown. Meanwhile, the remaining aspects decreased over the period given.
As can be seen from the diagram, the number of people living in London shared the view that the range of shops is the best thing accounted for approximately a half in year 1. After this year, this number witnessed a slight decline to more than 40% in year 2 then a minimal rise in year 3. In a similar fashion, the figure for people who were of the view that nightlife is the best made up 25% in year 1. After that, it fell considerably to a fifth in year 2. Subsequently, it recovered to rise marginally in year 3.
According to the chart, the job opportunities were thought to be the best things by nearly 37% of total people accommodating in London. Following this, the rate of people thinking job chances are the best things dropped to 35% in year 2 and levelled off at this point until year 3. Moreover, the mixture of people was thought to be the best by over 35% or total people staying in this city. Furthermore, this proportion remained constant in year 2. however, it witnessed a marginal fall in year 3.
As the diagram suggests, the museums and art galleries were regarded as the best by around a quarter of all people living in London in year 1. Then, this percentage climbed gradually to slight over 25% in year 3. Another thing to add is that the number of people considering transport as the best thing comprised more than a fifth in year 1. In the following year, it showed a minimal decrease then grew considerably to 25% in year 3.
Overall, after the period given, the number of people who thought the range of shops is the best thing still consisted of the highest percentage of total people living in London in the years given.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "In a similar fashion" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...n year 2 then a minimal rise in year 3. In a similar fashion, the figure for people who were of the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 449, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...proportion remained constant in year 2. however, it witnessed a marginal fall in year 3...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 186, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
...of total people living in London in the years given.
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e living in London in the years given.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, well, while, another thing, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 33.7804878049 198% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 965.302439024 174% => OK
No of words: 368.0 196.424390244 187% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5652173913 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 3.73543355544 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59484547948 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 106.607317073 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.404891304348 0.547539520022 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 491.4 283.868780488 173% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 8.94146341463 201% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4878801952 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3333333333 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05555555556 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218421858699 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875343635962 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655915141209 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158783512105 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809509323785 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.