The bar charts and line graph below show the results of a survey conducted over a three-year period to discover what people who live in London think of the city
The charts above display the number of a survey which explains people thinking about london. Interestingly though, it is measured in percentage. At first glance, it was evident that range of shops had the highest percentage which represented the best thing to live in london while in the opposite, traffic congestion was the worst thing and litter was a crucial problem in this country for three consecutive years.
Moving to a more detailed analysis concerning to the first bar charts, the biggest amount of the reason to stay in London was reached by range of shops, it was more than two-fifths while job opportunities and a mixture of people were upper a third during the period. However, Museums and Art galleries rose slightly in the range about a fifth to a quarter whereas night life and transport decreased in the second year but increased in the next year having the same gap with museums and Art galleries. In addition, the next chart had the identic percentage in the first year from cost of living, traffic congestion, and crime were over a half while in the next time, cost of living and crime declined and climbed in the end of the year but traffic congestion was inverse of it. Afterwards, the same number was achieved by mixture of people and the cost of housing about 30% to over a third whereas transport gained resemblant amount of it but decreased in the next year, approximately a quarter.
Turning to the line graph, litter attained the dominant percentage stood at 70% in the initial year and had a peak in the second years around three quarters but decreased in the end of the year. Then, air quality and noise came down consecutively to approximately 60% and 50% through all of the years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ly to approximately 60% and 50% through all of the years.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, then, third, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 965.302439024 147% => OK
No of words: 299.0 196.424390244 152% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74581939799 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60916298018 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 106.607317073 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501672240803 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 429.3 283.868780488 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.1467789299 43.030603864 186% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.666666667 112.824112599 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.2222222222 22.9334400587 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 5.23603664747 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190015665665 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768360199834 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061937741439 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124442689304 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00524060272163 0.0819641961636 6% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.