The bar charts below show the number of hours each teacher spent teaching in different schools in four different countries in 2001.

Essay topics:

The bar charts below show the number of hours each teacher spent teaching in different schools in four different countries in 2001.

The bar chart illustrate number of hours spent by teacher in primary, lower Secondary And Higher Secondary School in Japan, Spain, Iceland and USA.

overall teacher in US spent more hour in all level of school compare to other country's teacher. Number of teaching hour is also increases with level of class in all countries.

In USA, each teacher spent highest almost 1200 hour to teach upper secondary students while Japanese teacher spend only 700 hours to teach upper secondary pupils which is the lowest for in all countries. Instructor of Spain and Iceland also spent significant amount time(approximately 900 hours) to train upper secondary student.

Primary and lower secondary school teacher of Japan and Iceland spent nearly 600 hours on schooling. This number is slightly higher for Spain, where a teacher spent almost 650 and 750 hours respectively. On other hand USA, a teacher of primary and lower secondary school spent 750 and 100 hours to teach student which is higher among all countries.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...l in Japan, Spain, Iceland and USA. overall teacher in US spent more hour in all le...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hour' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hours'.
Suggestion: hours
... each teacher spent highest almost 1200 hour to teach upper secondary students while...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13939393939 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53731744131 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490909090909 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2439172886 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301175367144 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163943882954 0.103423049105 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512842709047 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217025555768 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281014844443 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.