The bar graph represents the total number of calls in billion minutes made by the people of Australia. These phone calls are divided into three parts such as local, national & international and calls made from mobile over eight periods of time.
Overall, we can see that higher number of people were found doing local calls in Australia whereas, some of them were involved in making national & international calls as well. But it shows that calls made from mobile phones were very less as compared to other two categories.
We can see that people in Australia who did local calls increased rapidly to a point and decreased gradually. In 2001 it reached 72 billion furthermore, the highest point was in 2005 which was 90 billion and from 2006 we can see slight decrease in calls made by people declining to 84 billion and finally reaching its lowest ratio in 2008 by 72 billion. Therefore, it shows that people who were involved in making national & international calls increased gradually in the beginning at 2001 the calls were 38 billion increasing to 50 billion in 2005 and reaching the heights at 2008 which was 61 billion.
The calls made from mobile phones were shown as the lowest because in 2001 only two billion calls were made by the people but it increased gradually over time in 2004 people who used mobile phones to call were 9 billion increasing to 39 billion on 2007 and finally rising to 46 billion in the end.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...represents the total number of calls in billion minutes made by the people of Australia...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... made from mobile phones were very less as compared to other two categories. W...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, so, therefore, well, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1190.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77911646586 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46182749359 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461847389558 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 345.6 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.0850192481 43.030603864 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.75 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.125 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226240576761 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126554494858 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458276878875 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163217539694 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476785614595 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.04 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.