the chart below shows the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons while relevant.
The pie charts depict the sodium consume, saturated fats and added sugar in meals of the people of America, which may cause harmful for health if these taken much.
Overall, it is clear from these charts that people take the largest part of all nutrients in dinner except added sugar and the smallest part of breakfast. In the context of snacks time, people consume the added sugar most. In lunch, it almost remains the same about all nutrients.
Firstly, according to pie charts, in dinner time, people take the sodium is near about half of all nutrients, saturated fat is 37% and added sugar is roughly a quarter. When it comes to added sugar people takes it most in snacks time which is 42% and other nutrients are respectively sodium is 14% and saturated fat is 21%.
Additionally, people take fewer nutrients in breakfast and the amount is almost near about sodium, saturated fat and added sugar which is respectively 14%, 16%, 16%. Similarly, in lunch, people of America consume the amount of nutrient which has no significant difference and these are sodium 29%, saturated fat 26%, and added sugar is 19%. To end, people take the largest part of nutrients in dinner and the smallest part of breakfast.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, similarly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83732057416 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39714351198 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.44976076555 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.827946437 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.333333333 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0668310871737 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038794422733 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359253052969 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0599434549392 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356405110549 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.