The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries in consumer goods in 2010. (pounds sterling)
The given histogram describes the total cost of house-hold goods in 2010. The records mainly concern two nation: France and UK. The expenditure is calibrated on the pound sterling.
As seen clearly from the barchart, the people of UK spent enormous amount of money on vehicles with around 450,000 pounds sterling in 2010, whereas individuals of France were less disposed towards cars. Moreover, computers was second choice for people of france and they paid up almost higher than 350,000 pounds sterling on it.
Moving further, Cameras were less famous for popularity in France, as a result 150,000 pounds sterling were disbursed on it, same as in UK there were mediocre response for the perfume. Beside this, community of the UK seems to be avid reader they spent more money on books as compare to france.
Overall, perfume and computers were the first choices of the France public for spent money in 2010, While public of the UK were more believe on cars and books for spent money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'nation' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'nations'.
Suggestion: nations
...in 2010. The records mainly concern two nation: France and UK. The expenditure is cali...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...inly concern two nation: France and UK. The expenditure is calibrated on the pound ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, second, whereas, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94610778443 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32708509482 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604790419162 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2270786632 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.25 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142672830711 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077285641723 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528544474502 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0987502335652 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706113128104 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.