The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar charts illustrates the regularity of American people went to fast food restaurants in 2003, 2006 and 2013. Overall, throughout the surveyed period, people who ate fast food daily or never ate them constituted relatively low rates, while most Americans cline out at such restaurants weekly or one or two times every month.
To be more specific, 4% of American residents ate junk food every day in 2003. This percentage graduately declined to 3% in 2006 and levelling off at it thereafter. Similarly, those who never cline out at fast food restaurants started its figure at 5%, and then moderately decreased to 4% after 2006.
On the contrary, the majority of the USA people chose to eat junk food once a weed in 2003 and 2006, which accounted for 31% and 33% respectively. This proportion dropped to 27% in 2013 as more people in that year ate in fast food restaurants only once or twice a month (33%). People who visited such kink of restaurants several times a week and a few times a year also shared a similar pattern, with the range of 12% to 20% respectively during the period.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: Overall, throughout the surveyed period, people who ate fast food daily or never ate them constituted relatively low rates, while most Americans cline out at such restaurants weekly or one or two times every month.
Error: cline Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: This percentage graduately declined to 3 in 2006 and levelling off at it thereafter.
Error: graduately Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: Similarly, those who never cline out at fast food restaurants started its figure at 5, and then moderately decreased to 4 after 2006.
Error: cline Suggestion: No alternate word
---------------------
flaws:
'People who visited such kink of restaurants several times a week and a few times a year also shared a similar pattern'
well, they don't share a similar pattern.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 3 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 192 200
No. of Characters: 866 1000
No. of Different Words: 111 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.722 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.51 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.675 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 49 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 37 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 30 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 23 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.297 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.453 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.642 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.111 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'illustrate'.
Suggestion: illustrate
The bar charts illustrates the regularity of American people went ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, similarly, so, then, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6875 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69385150621 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609375 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6490035054 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210201181899 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102294455257 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663187294662 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149945823594 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457602698301 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.