The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given charts compare the differences of annual expenditure in a particular English school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. Overall, a considerable amount of money was spent on teachers’ salaries, and a minimum expense was for insurance throughout the surveyed period.
First of all, it can be seen from the graphs that nearly a half of the annual cost was used to pay teachers as its proportion started at 40% in 1981, and then slightly increased to 50% in 1991 before falling back to 45% in 2001. Similarly, the figure of resources like books experienced the same trend but with a more significant way, for wh9ich first rose its rate from 15% to 20% in the first decade, and dramatically shrank to 9% in the end. By contrast, a reverse change can be viewed in the category of furniture and equipment. With constituting the same portion with the resource (15%) in 1981, the spend on furniture and equipment firstly decreased to 5% before bouncing back to 23% in 2001.
On the other hand, unlike the fluctuation of the former categories, other teachers’ salaries nearly halved its proportion by continually falling from 28% to 15% in the twenty years while the expenditure on insurance quadrupled from 2% to 8% in this period.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
for wh9ich first rose its rate from 15% to 20%
for which it first rose its rate from 15% to 20%
the spend on furniture and equipment
the expenses/spending on furniture and equipment
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 10
No. of Words: 211 200
No. of Characters: 972 1000
No. of Different Words: 123 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.811 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.607 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.771 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 70 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 48 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 37 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 26 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 30.143 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.306 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.571 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.433 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.661 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.058 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 599, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... portion with the resource 15% in 1981, the spend on furniture and equipment firstly decr...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, similarly, so, then, while, as for, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1022.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84360189573 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88630650778 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57345971564 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.2230054819 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.0 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1428571429 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1428571429 5.23603664747 251% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116776469257 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645839823677 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755623625091 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0793405528669 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635544005787 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.