The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart compares the proportion of English and Welsh in owned and rented houses from 1918 to 2011. In general, the growing rate of households in the two types of accommodation was inverse.

In 1918, the percentage of families in owned accommodation was dramatically low, at approximately 24%. However, the proportion rose steadily through time and eventually leveled with that of households in rented properties in 1971, meeting the mark 50%. In the following years, the number continued to grow and peaked in 2001, at just under 70%.

On the other hand, the percentage of households in rented accommodation in England and Wales was high in the beginning but fell drastically throughout the course of 93 years. In 1918, the proportion was at approximately 78% which was about 3 times higher than that of owned. Surprisingly, it started to decline, plunging down to just under 60% in 1961.. The percentage hit the lowest point of 31% in 2001, which was only half of that of owned residents. However, the number started to bounce back in 2011.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The bar chart compares the proportion of...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... types of accommodation was inverse. In 1918, the percentage of families in o...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d peaked in 2001, at just under 70%. On the other hand, the percentage of hou...
^^^
Line 5, column 355, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
... plunging down to just under 60% in 1961.. The percentage hit the lowest point of ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, in general, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96610169492 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90193163052 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54802259887 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9490515797 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.9 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199874872104 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779518811083 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065103073645 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148093052473 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329524081808 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.