The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart gives information about the data off time (minutes) on telephone contacts, especially calls in the UK at the period of seven years from 1995 to 2002. It is clear the national and international calls are the highest in all time and the mobiles one are the smallest.
Three categories divided into two trends. To begin with, the local fixed line calls and the mobiles increased from 1995 to 2002. The time of local calls in the next years were slightly longer than the precious one about 3 billion-minutes per year. For movement in the same direction, the length of mobiles calls witnessed a significant upturn of 40 billion-minutes from three to more than 40.
On the other hands, there were a minimally growth on the data of national and international calls's time from 1995 to 1999. By the year of 1999, this one reach a peak at approximately 90 billion-minutes, but later it fell down to 70 billions as the beginning. Although the length of calls dropped for a long time, national and international fixed line calls accounted for the most time of calling
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('minimally') instead an adjective, or a noun ('growth') instead of another adjective.
...n 40. On the other hands, there were a minimally growth on the data of national and internation...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74331550802 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85405232736 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550802139037 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5331050725 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5555555556 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223267330526 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100768542692 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606947339289 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164399266061 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525142971422 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.